Re: A Normalization Question
Date: 15 Jul 2004 02:47:43 -0700
Message-ID: <c0e3f26e.0407150147.108c951f_at_posting.google.com>
"Marshall Spight" <mspight_at_dnai.com> wrote in message news:<IMjJc.81437$%_6.7213_at_attbi_s01>...
> "Larry Coon" <lcnospam_at_assist.org> wrote in message news:40F5B0C4.1948@assist.org...
> >
> > There are many things about your posts in this thread that
> > I find stunningly ironic. One is that in your campaign to
> > eliminate all physical redundancy, you post this same
> > example over and over and over.
>
> Ain't that a hoot!
This thread is futile, because Neo is that strange oxymoron, the intelligent idiot. I mean, it must take some intelligence to come up with this weird and self-consistent "data model" of his; and yet he completely fails to grasp the most rudimentary principles of data. Yet Neo's conceit is that ONLY he trully understands data, and EVERYONE else is wrong. No matter how many times his errors are pointed out and explained, he will NOT get it, because he KNOWS he is the only person who really understands and that we are all wrong, so he will not listen. Received on Thu Jul 15 2004 - 11:47:43 CEST