Re: Ah, but who has better parties?
From: Leandro Guimaraens Faria Corsetti Dutra <leandro_at_dutra.fastmail.fm>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 14:50:18 -0300
Message-ID: <pan.2004.05.26.17.50.18.873057_at_dutra.fastmail.fm>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 14:50:18 -0300
Message-ID: <pan.2004.05.26.17.50.18.873057_at_dutra.fastmail.fm>
Em Wed, 26 May 2004 09:28:50 -0700, Gene Wirchenko escreveu:
>> You are totally offbase. xBase as a language is not SQL, and
>>is even less relational than SQL. Not only that, xBase *products*'s
> SQL, not that it is SQL.
>
> Are you being deliberately obtuse? I have said that xBASE has
And I said it makes a world of difference to the worst.
>>SQL flavours and capabilities suffer from having to support >>navigational access too.> record-oriented commands are very useful with a result set.
>
> I find that having the two approaches is a strength. xBASE
You are mixing data access with procedural processing.
But I guess you're just as hopeless as the others I plonked...
-- Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra +55 (11) 5685 2219 Av Sgto Geraldo Santana, 1100 6/71 leandro_at_dutra.fastmail.fm 04.674-000 São Paulo, SP BRASIL http://br.geocities.com./lgcdutra/Received on Wed May 26 2004 - 19:50:18 CEST