Re: Normalization and DBMS
Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 18:25:19 -0300
Message-ID: <pan.2004.05.11.21.25.17.712587_at_dutra.fastmail.fm>
Em Tue, 11 May 2004 15:09:12 -0500, Dawn M. Wolthuis escreveu:
> That is the only logic I can find behind 1NF and I have found
1NF was initially applied to clean our databases of such
horrors as:
CREATE TABLE
> absolutely NO and I mean NO emperical data to suggest that putting
> data into 1NF helps minimize the cost of the system for the long
> haul.
(
subject,
year,
grade_jan,
grade_feb,
...
)
;
These were known as repeating groups. Now there is a debate about nested tables which I haven't looked into properly. But I do maintain that getting rid of repeating groups is The Right Thing To Do, and one of the reasons why relational is so much better.
Now feel free to trounce me... this post was lousy, I'm too lazy know to do anything formal enough.
-- Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra +55 (11) 5685 2219 Av Sgto Geraldo Santana, 1100 6/71 +55 (11) 5686 9607 04.674-000 São Paulo, SP BRASIL http://br.geocities.com./lgcdutra/Received on Tue May 11 2004 - 23:25:19 CEST