Re: c.d.theory lexicon overview
Date: Sun, 09 May 2004 21:22:44 -0700
Message-ID: <sfhr90tq6gocq3ib2u0ddh11q55t9s2pk5_at_4ax.com>
"Anthony W. Youngman" <wol_at_thewolery.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>In message <7FKhc.1320$17.155177_at_news1.epix.net>, Senny
><sennomo_at_hotmail.com> writes
>>ROOT PROBLEM:
>>
>>Computer science lacks a precise terminology. This is the
>>real problem we have to tackle if we wish to fix the specific problem of
>>database theory discussion.
>
>EVEN DEEPER PROBLEM
>
>Computer Science (to me at least) seems not to be science at all. It's
>actually maths.
>
>And while the two may morph into each other, Computer Science seems to
>belong firmly in the "pure maths" category which, by definition, is not
>scientific at all.
Say what? I would put it in the category of pure science.
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
Computerese Irregular Verb Conjugation:
I have preferences.
You have biases.
He/She has prejudices.
Received on Mon May 10 2004 - 06:22:44 CEST