Re: Primary Key Theory Question

From: Mike Sherrill <MSherrillnonono_at_compuserve.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2004 05:57:58 -0500
Message-ID: <jpvv601vj87f081e5f6q03rbmq946i3fm9_at_4ax.com>

On Sat, 3 Apr 2004 15:47:47 +0200, "ben brugman" <ben_at_niethier.nl> wrote:

>By definition this can not be a candidate key and therefore
>can't be a primairy key either.

I never said it was. In fact, I said "There's no key".

-- 
Mike Sherrill
Information Management Systems

Received on Mon Apr 05 2004 - 12:57:58 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Laconic2: "Re: Object Class and Data Type"
Previous message: Mike Sherrill: "Re: Object Class and Data Type"
Maybe in reply to: ben brugman: "Re: Primary Key Theory Question"
In reply to ben brugman: "Re: Primary Key Theory Question"
Next in thread: Laconic2: "Re: Object Class and Data Type"
Reply: ben brugman: "Re: Primary Key Theory Question"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message