Re: What are we asking of a data model?

From: Joe \ <joe_at_bftsi0.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:16:16 -0800
Message-ID: <1073863000.353271_at_news-1.nethere.net>

"SPeacock" <Xpeacock_at_pacbell.net> wrote in message <news:4001BE3B.3BFF4B97_at_pacbell.net>...

> all of these by using only a single (the same) tuple.

While, of course, the Pure-OO solution gets to embed absolutely anything whatsoever inside the "equivalent" objects, including arrays, collections, trees, reflection, etc. etc. etc., right?

--
Joe Foster <mailto:jlfoster%40znet.com>  DC8s in Spaace: <http://www.xenu.net/>
WARNING: I cannot be held responsible for the above        They're   coming  to
because  my cats have  apparently  learned to type.        take me away, ha ha!

Received on Mon Jan 12 2004 - 00:16:16 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Adrian Kubala: "Re: relations aren't types?"
Previous message: Adrian Kubala: "Re: Stored fields ordered left to right"
Maybe in reply to: Dawn M. Wolthuis: "What are we asking of a data model?"
In reply to SPeacock: "Re: What are we asking of a data model?"
Next in thread: Adrian Kubala: "Re: relations aren't types?"
Reply: SPeacock: "Re: What are we asking of a data model?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message