Re: Hierachical structures - an overview
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 16:15:31 -0600
Message-ID: <bta3ac$69i$1_at_news.netins.net>
"Paul" <paul_at_not.a.chance.ie> wrote in message
news:MPG.1a628b0ca4a651a8989874_at_news1.eircom.net...
>
>
> dwolt_at_tincat-group.com says...
>
> > One of these directions is an array/list/relation
> > of links which means yet another frickin' table in an RDBMS.
>
>
> Fancy that! More fricken (we say friggin over here) information means
> yet another fricken table in an RDBMS - isn't that just shocking?
>
and if I thought that there really were gains by taking an application that
could be 10 non-RDBMS database"files" (tables that include tables as
elements) and exploding it to more than 100 tables, I would be in favor of
all those tables, but I don't, so I'm not. ;-)
>
> Paul...
>
>
> BTW, your point about sports analogies and women was interesting, what
> is your own turf? Ever seen Gazon Maudit?
>
Good job landing a question that is "on my turf" but, alas, that film is
still on my "must see sometime" list.
Cheers! --dawn
>
> --
> plinehan y_a_h_o_o and d_o_t com
> C++ Builder 5 SP1, Interbase 6.0.1.6 IBX 5.04 W2K Pro
> Please do not top-post.
>
> "XML avoids the fundamental question of what we should do,
> by focusing entirely on how we should do it."
>
> quote from http://www.metatorial.com
Received on Sun Jan 04 2004 - 23:15:31 CET