Re: OOP - a question about database access

"Universe" <universe_at_covad.net> wrote in message news:b8342$3fba997d$3f47e403

> RCM is wrong to fetishize dynamic polymorphism as especially OO while
> according to his sterile, arteriosclerotic world view he avoids,
> downplays that all object/class phenomena result from the interaction
> and collaboration of objects/classes in relationship networks.

And worse RMartin doesn't see, or think objects in collaboration networks apply in an essential way to analyzing high level requirements and their domain.

Imagine the reduction in complexity if there was implementation of key, relevant domain object abstractions and their collaboration as the logical core of the system's high level object model?

Elliott

>
> Indeed these
> ` objects/classes are the core/key granule of abstraction, and
> ` objects/classes collaborate in networks of relationships and
> ` as a result manifest or make profound abstraction, polymorphism,
> identity, encapsulation, state, [metamorphism, aspects]
> are the fundamentals of the OO modelling paradigm
>
> Elliott
> --
> Be bold, be artistically imaginative, yet scientifically grounded --
DO
> GREAT OO MODELLING WITH OBJECTS OF ALL TYPES!!
> --
> *~* Theory Leads, Practice Verifies *~*
> *~* Global Plans + IID (Iterative & Incremental Development) *~*
>
>
Received on Tue Nov 18 2003 - 23:35:16 CET