Implementing small, fixed domains
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2003 22:05:58 -0500
Message-ID: <W_4gb.75$BH5.121691_at_news.uswest.net>
Hi,
I have a schema design question... By 'small, fixed domains', I'm referring to information suach as: Customer.Sex {Male, Female}; ClientPhone.Type {Home, Work, Cell, Pager, Fax}; ClientAddress.Type {Billing, Shipping}; Customer.MaritalStatus {Single, Married, Divorced, Widowed, Polygamist}...
On the other hand, they could be modeled as entities themselves and implemented as separate tables which requires joins to 'translate'. Advantages: domain values can be edited, added or deleted; perhaps simpler to comprehend schema and design front-end app (no need to refer to documentation to interpret the meaning of attribute values such as '1, 2, 3', because this is exposed in the schema...).
Also, let's say that the types of domains we're talking about are known from the start to be a fixed set that will not need to be edited or amended by users, which, if they did would necessarily make the case for a separate entity/table.
So what else should one consider when deciding how to actually represent these types of values in the database schema?
thanks for any advice,
Ken Received on Mon Oct 06 2003 - 05:05:58 CEST
