Re: semantic data structure/web architecture and innate logic

Originally posted by Wick

> Nice of you to be so thorough and thoughtful. Thanks.

> Let me reiterate, the human memory system is two memory system-
> conceptual/perceptual. So, in simulating it, we make the assumption
> there are only two columns (this is based in neurophysiological
> science). Using two columns and creating links between nodes might
> seem exponential (n squared), but that doesn't happen in the real
> world. How come? Specificity using cognitive functions of deduction,
> reduction, recall, reasoning, association, categorization, imaging
> is provided along with structure determined innate logic. What's
> logic anyways? if a=b and b=c, then a=c remember? IF-THEN
> automatically (many to many and multi-format as well). Our system
> automatically makes these dynamic associations. Sooo, the long and
> short of it is: embedded machine logic alongside the information
> management and retrieval cognitive functionalities unified in dual
> reciprocal processing memory structure yields logN processing
> speeds, much smaller memory allocation space and provides 60% or
> more less dba effort.

> I'd be happy to send you a more thorough treatise on the subject.

> And perhaps you may see whay we are claiming to have the next gen
> semantic web structure as well.

> Thanks!

> Wick

In your starting post you said: "What I am trying to understand is if what I am claiming about the semantic data structure makes any sense to any db experts. I guess I'm talking a different language... "

From this one would assume you do not claim yourself to be a db expert. How then can you justify your assertion that your 2 column model "provides 60% or more less dba effort."?

Your idea sounds like the usual "hyper-generic" database design that consists of 2 tables: "Thing" and "Relationship".

--
Posted via http://dbforums.com