Re: Corrected definition of locally invertible transformation
From: Mikito Harakiri <mikharakiri_at_ywho.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 16:00:08 -0700
Message-ID: <tEr9b.34$lB2.178_at_news.oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 16:00:08 -0700
Message-ID: <tEr9b.34$lB2.178_at_news.oracle.com>
"Jan Hidders" <jan.hidders_at_pandora.be> wrote in message
news:dSq9b.22183$Sp4.1459250_at_phobos.telenet-ops.be...
> Mikito Harakiri wrote:
> > Given
> >
> > Q * D = V
> >
> > Q is called locally invertible if there doesn't exist D' != D, such that
> >
> > Q * D' = V
>
> Right! Just to be absolutely sure let me verify the folllowing:
>
> "globally invertable" = "injective"
>
> Right?
Absolutely. Received on Tue Sep 16 2003 - 01:00:08 CEST