Re: Possible problems with Date & McGoveran View Updating
From: Jan Hidders <jan.hidders_at_pandora.be>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 18:01:47 GMT
Message-ID: <f8n9b.21901$fy3.1381448_at_phobos.telenet-ops.be>
>
> IMO "updatable view" is a bad term. It has the same sense as "updatable
> table".
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 18:01:47 GMT
Message-ID: <f8n9b.21901$fy3.1381448_at_phobos.telenet-ops.be>
Alfredo Novoa wrote:
> Jan Hidders <jan.hidders_at_pandora.be> wrote in message
> news:<Ym%8b.20114$7y3.1376399_at_phobos.telenet-ops.be>...
>
>> By the way, what is exactly your definition of "updatable"? Should there >> be at least one instance and one update such that the result is >> well-defined, or should for all instances all updates be definied, or >> something in between?
>
> IMO "updatable view" is a bad term. It has the same sense as "updatable
> table".
That's why we have definitions. What is yours?
- Jan Hidders