Home
->
Usenet
->
comp.databases.theory
-> by author
comp.databases.theory: by author
412 messages
:
Starting
Tue Apr 01 2003 - 00:09:34 CEST,
Ending
Wed Apr 30 2003 - 23:59:19 CEST
sort by
: [
thread
] [ author ] [
date
] [
subject
]
Nearby
: [
About this archive
] [
Other mail archives
]
--CELKO--
Re: primary ID trick: speed/disk space?
(Mon Apr 28 2003 - 21:07:32 CEST)
Re: One to One relationships
(Sat Apr 26 2003 - 21:19:01 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type - What is really Boolean and what is not?
(Sat Apr 26 2003 - 01:27:13 CEST)
Re: getting the maximum from multiple returns
(Fri Apr 25 2003 - 04:31:22 CEST)
Re: Is multi-type data in one field normal?
(Fri Apr 25 2003 - 04:08:09 CEST)
Re: One to One relationships
(Fri Apr 25 2003 - 03:06:56 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Fri Apr 18 2003 - 00:26:02 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Fri Apr 18 2003 - 00:19:00 CEST)
Re: Who invitented the division operator in relational algebra and why?
(Fri Apr 18 2003 - 00:10:08 CEST)
Re: Primary Keys and Foreign Keys
(Mon Apr 14 2003 - 20:43:49 CEST)
Re: FK -> non PK - bad design?
(Sun Apr 13 2003 - 02:24:54 CEST)
Re: Is multi-type data in one field normal?
(Sun Apr 13 2003 - 02:22:03 CEST)
Re: FK -> non PK - bad design?
(Sun Apr 13 2003 - 01:55:37 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Sun Apr 13 2003 - 01:40:48 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Sun Apr 13 2003 - 01:33:46 CEST)
Re: FK -> non PK - bad design?
(Fri Apr 11 2003 - 16:19:51 CEST)
Re: FK -> non PK - bad design?
(Fri Apr 11 2003 - 16:13:05 CEST)
Re: Is multi-type data in one field normal?
(Thu Apr 10 2003 - 17:27:05 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Wed Apr 09 2003 - 18:29:15 CEST)
Re: FK -> non PK - bad design?
(Wed Apr 09 2003 - 17:55:35 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Wed Apr 09 2003 - 01:11:22 CEST)
Re: Celko: short book on the nested sets model for trees.
(Wed Apr 09 2003 - 01:05:28 CEST)
Re: Celko: short book on the nested sets model for trees.
(Sat Apr 05 2003 - 20:54:53 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Fri Apr 04 2003 - 03:53:10 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Thu Apr 03 2003 - 03:55:27 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Thu Apr 03 2003 - 03:51:38 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Thu Apr 03 2003 - 03:44:36 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Thu Apr 03 2003 - 03:35:41 CEST)
Alan
Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site
(Wed Apr 23 2003 - 16:13:42 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Wed Apr 09 2003 - 18:57:03 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Wed Apr 09 2003 - 15:38:48 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Tue Apr 08 2003 - 21:25:11 CEST)
Alfredo Novoa
Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss
(Wed Apr 30 2003 - 12:21:35 CEST)
Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss
(Wed Apr 30 2003 - 12:14:16 CEST)
Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept?
(Wed Apr 30 2003 - 11:56:33 CEST)
Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept?
(Fri Apr 25 2003 - 12:02:58 CEST)
Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept?
(Fri Apr 25 2003 - 11:57:01 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Mon Apr 14 2003 - 12:01:33 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Fri Apr 11 2003 - 16:34:50 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Fri Apr 04 2003 - 12:19:08 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Fri Apr 04 2003 - 12:13:34 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Fri Apr 04 2003 - 11:56:47 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Thu Apr 03 2003 - 16:23:53 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Tue Apr 01 2003 - 09:55:36 CEST)
Amund Trovåg
Re: Who invitented the division operator in relational algebra and why?
(Tue Apr 15 2003 - 15:39:53 CEST)
Who invitented the division operator in relational algebra and why?
(Tue Apr 15 2003 - 13:07:31 CEST)
andrewst
Re: Selectivity
(Wed Apr 30 2003 - 15:56:28 CEST)
Re: Selectivity
(Wed Apr 30 2003 - 12:33:07 CEST)
Re: Accounting ERD
(Sun Apr 27 2003 - 23:32:06 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Fri Apr 25 2003 - 14:07:22 CEST)
Re: Help with a query please
(Wed Apr 23 2003 - 11:21:09 CEST)
Re: Normalization and Design Question
(Tue Apr 22 2003 - 18:58:48 CEST)
Re: FK -> non PK - bad design?
(Fri Apr 11 2003 - 17:58:13 CEST)
Re: FK -> non PK - bad design?
(Wed Apr 09 2003 - 18:39:21 CEST)
Re: FK -> non PK - bad design?
(Wed Apr 09 2003 - 17:44:07 CEST)
Re: Database table "triangle"... allowed or not
(Sun Apr 06 2003 - 15:53:18 CEST)
Re: newton binomial coefficient
(Wed Apr 02 2003 - 13:35:12 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Wed Apr 02 2003 - 12:30:41 CEST)
Anith Sen
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Thu Apr 10 2003 - 18:14:35 CEST)
Re: ORM and FORML
(Wed Apr 09 2003 - 20:14:40 CEST)
Re: simple database
(Tue Apr 08 2003 - 17:08:37 CEST)
Re: Are DOMAINs part of SQL-99 standard?
(Fri Apr 04 2003 - 20:07:45 CEST)
Anne & Lynn Wheeler
Codd's death (x-post from a.f.c)
(Sun Apr 20 2003 - 20:36:57 CEST)
Re: How to cope with missing values - NULLS?
(Sat Apr 19 2003 - 19:14:47 CEST)
Re: How to cope with missing values - NULLS?
(Sat Apr 19 2003 - 18:50:01 CEST)
Barry
Re: Simple ER problem cant figure out how to model
(Sun Apr 13 2003 - 10:39:34 CEST)
Re: Which Database Program For Me?
(Sun Apr 13 2003 - 10:06:56 CEST)
Re: student question
(Sat Apr 05 2003 - 18:47:53 CEST)
Baseman
Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site
(Tue Apr 08 2003 - 01:49:14 CEST)
Bernard Peek
Re: newbie: using id's or total desciption
(Mon Apr 28 2003 - 10:32:34 CEST)
Re: newbie: using id's or total desciption
(Fri Apr 25 2003 - 15:02:29 CEST)
Re: newbie: using id's or total desciption
(Fri Apr 25 2003 - 14:58:01 CEST)
Re: newbie: using id's or total desciption
(Thu Apr 24 2003 - 19:28:56 CEST)
Re: Back up options
(Mon Apr 14 2003 - 17:40:20 CEST)
Re: FK -> non PK - bad design?
(Mon Apr 14 2003 - 17:26:28 CEST)
Re: Back up options
(Fri Apr 11 2003 - 16:46:21 CEST)
Re: FK -> non PK - bad design?
(Wed Apr 09 2003 - 22:46:49 CEST)
Bert Blink
Re: Primary Keys and Foreign Keys
(Mon Apr 14 2003 - 03:20:17 CEST)
Re: Primary Keys and Foreign Keys
(Mon Apr 14 2003 - 00:59:28 CEST)
Bishop
Creating the right index for multiple keyword searching
(Fri Apr 11 2003 - 12:56:25 CEST)
Bob Badour
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Tue Apr 01 2003 - 05:50:28 CEST)
Re: Selectivity
(Wed Apr 30 2003 - 21:46:19 CEST)
Re: primary ID trick: speed/disk space?
(Wed Apr 30 2003 - 21:32:48 CEST)
Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site
(Sun Apr 27 2003 - 03:10:49 CEST)
Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept?
(Fri Apr 25 2003 - 23:11:29 CEST)
Re: newbie: using id's or total desciption
(Thu Apr 24 2003 - 19:07:18 CEST)
Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept?
(Thu Apr 24 2003 - 18:49:43 CEST)
Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site
(Thu Apr 24 2003 - 18:48:28 CEST)
Re: getting the maximum from multiple returns
(Thu Apr 24 2003 - 18:04:46 CEST)
Re: One to One relationships
(Thu Apr 24 2003 - 17:52:35 CEST)
Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site
(Wed Apr 23 2003 - 19:23:07 CEST)
Re: Is multi-type data in one field normal?
(Fri Apr 11 2003 - 23:31:18 CEST)
Re: FK -> non PK - bad design?
(Fri Apr 11 2003 - 23:11:16 CEST)
Re: Is multi-type data in one field normal?
(Fri Apr 11 2003 - 23:07:01 CEST)
Re: Is multi-type data in one field normal?
(Fri Apr 11 2003 - 22:17:20 CEST)
Re: FK -> non PK - bad design?
(Fri Apr 11 2003 - 21:46:24 CEST)
Re: Is multi-type data in one field normal?
(Fri Apr 11 2003 - 22:17:20 CEST)
Re: FK -> non PK - bad design?
(Fri Apr 11 2003 - 21:46:24 CEST)
Re: FK -> non PK - bad design?
(Fri Apr 11 2003 - 21:46:24 CEST)
Re: Is multi-type data in one field normal?
(Fri Apr 11 2003 - 22:17:20 CEST)
Re: FK -> non PK - bad design?
(Fri Apr 11 2003 - 21:46:24 CEST)
Re: FK -> non PK - bad design?
(Fri Apr 11 2003 - 21:46:24 CEST)
Re: Is multi-type data in one field normal?
(Fri Apr 11 2003 - 03:52:21 CEST)
Re: Is multi-type data in one field normal?
(Thu Apr 10 2003 - 11:32:24 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Thu Apr 10 2003 - 06:00:48 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Wed Apr 09 2003 - 22:34:19 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Wed Apr 09 2003 - 19:17:25 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Wed Apr 09 2003 - 18:40:12 CEST)
Re: FK -> non PK - bad design?
(Wed Apr 09 2003 - 18:37:55 CEST)
Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site
(Wed Apr 09 2003 - 00:16:41 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Tue Apr 08 2003 - 06:53:57 CEST)
Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site
(Tue Apr 08 2003 - 06:37:19 CEST)
Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site
(Tue Apr 08 2003 - 06:32:34 CEST)
Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site
(Tue Apr 08 2003 - 05:55:09 CEST)
Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site
(Tue Apr 08 2003 - 05:56:10 CEST)
Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site
(Tue Apr 08 2003 - 05:28:01 CEST)
Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site
(Mon Apr 07 2003 - 18:33:28 CEST)
Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site
(Mon Apr 07 2003 - 07:20:20 CEST)
Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site
(Mon Apr 07 2003 - 04:25:37 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Sat Apr 05 2003 - 09:37:25 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Sat Apr 05 2003 - 09:02:47 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Sat Apr 05 2003 - 09:37:25 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Sat Apr 05 2003 - 09:02:47 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Sat Apr 05 2003 - 09:02:47 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Sat Apr 05 2003 - 09:02:47 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Fri Apr 04 2003 - 05:18:50 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Fri Apr 04 2003 - 04:33:42 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Wed Apr 02 2003 - 21:03:52 CEST)
Re: Expressing SQL in relational algebra
(Wed Apr 02 2003 - 09:24:04 CEST)
Re: Expressing SQL in relational algebra
(Wed Apr 02 2003 - 09:06:02 CEST)
Re: Expressing SQL in relational algebra
(Wed Apr 02 2003 - 08:56:51 CEST)
Re: Expressing SQL in relational algebra
(Wed Apr 02 2003 - 08:50:55 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Wed Apr 02 2003 - 08:33:11 CEST)
Bruce Rennie
Re: The BOOLEAN data type - What is really Boolean and what is not?
(Sat Apr 26 2003 - 16:09:49 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type - What is really Boolean and what is not?
(Sat Apr 26 2003 - 16:04:07 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type - What is really Boolean and what is not?
(Sat Apr 26 2003 - 02:19:21 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type - What is really Boolean and what is not?
(Mon Apr 21 2003 - 12:30:30 CEST)
buckwheat
Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site
(Wed Apr 16 2003 - 03:18:21 CEST)
Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site
(Wed Apr 16 2003 - 03:16:23 CEST)
byrmol
Re: newton binomial coefficient
(Wed Apr 02 2003 - 07:21:34 CEST)
chris
Simple ER problem cant figure out how to model
(Sat Apr 12 2003 - 01:54:44 CEST)
Re: Back up options
(Fri Apr 11 2003 - 23:18:04 CEST)
Back up options
(Fri Apr 11 2003 - 12:58:23 CEST)
Costin Cozianu
Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss
(Wed Apr 30 2003 - 23:18:03 CEST)
Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss
(Tue Apr 29 2003 - 23:31:36 CEST)
Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss
(Tue Apr 29 2003 - 19:59:55 CEST)
Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept?
(Sun Apr 27 2003 - 19:31:38 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type - What is really Boolean and what is not?
(Sat Apr 26 2003 - 03:49:46 CEST)
Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept?
(Fri Apr 25 2003 - 17:29:59 CEST)
Re: How to cope with missing values - NULLS?
(Sat Apr 19 2003 - 21:50:48 CEST)
Re: How to cope with missing values - NULLS?
(Fri Apr 18 2003 - 18:54:51 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Fri Apr 18 2003 - 01:19:10 CEST)
Re: Is multi-type data in one field normal?
(Fri Apr 18 2003 - 01:01:47 CEST)
Re: Is multi-type data in one field normal?
(Thu Apr 10 2003 - 23:57:23 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Thu Apr 03 2003 - 22:32:45 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Thu Apr 03 2003 - 05:45:09 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Wed Apr 02 2003 - 04:55:02 CEST)
cr
How to infer causation from correlations
(Fri Apr 11 2003 - 03:57:22 CEST)
Damjan S. Vujnovic
Re: The BOOLEAN data type - What is really Boolean and what is not?
(Tue Apr 22 2003 - 12:22:51 CEST)
David
Re: Primary Keys and Foreign Keys
(Mon Apr 14 2003 - 10:38:42 CEST)
Primary Keys and Foreign Keys
(Sun Apr 13 2003 - 18:08:23 CEST)
David Fitzjarrell
Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site
(Mon Apr 28 2003 - 17:02:49 CEST)
Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site
(Sat Apr 26 2003 - 06:13:24 CEST)
Dieter Nöth
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Thu Apr 03 2003 - 09:15:02 CEST)
Don Burleson
Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site
(Sun Apr 06 2003 - 01:43:46 CEST)
Doobie Keebler
SQL Query Question
(Mon Apr 28 2003 - 17:46:07 CEST)
Dps
Re: Back up options
(Thu Apr 17 2003 - 10:30:45 CEST)
Local database file
(Wed Apr 16 2003 - 17:34:02 CEST)
Eirik Meland
ORM and FORML
(Mon Apr 07 2003 - 18:01:44 CEST)
Eltschinger Markus
Re: Are DOMAINs part of SQL-99 standard?
(Fri Apr 04 2003 - 20:16:21 CEST)
Eric Junkermann
Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept?
(Fri Apr 25 2003 - 12:55:14 CEST)
Re: Expressing SQL in relational algebra
(Tue Apr 08 2003 - 12:51:35 CEST)
feelingsometime
Help: Long for sources of Web Mining !
(Sat Apr 26 2003 - 17:41:53 CEST)
Gabriel Gonzalez
Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site
(Mon Apr 07 2003 - 19:46:39 CEST)
Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site
(Mon Apr 07 2003 - 13:57:29 CEST)
Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site
(Mon Apr 07 2003 - 04:46:08 CEST)
Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site
(Mon Apr 07 2003 - 04:35:56 CEST)
Geomancer
Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site
(Wed Apr 23 2003 - 23:24:12 CEST)
Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site
(Wed Apr 23 2003 - 01:41:37 CEST)
Gianluca Hotz
Re: EER and ORM data modelling
(Thu Apr 17 2003 - 15:15:49 CEST)
Glenn Holliday
Re: PL/SQL Server Pages
(Tue Apr 08 2003 - 18:30:57 CEST)
GoranG
Re: Selectivity
(Wed Apr 30 2003 - 17:34:40 CEST)
Re: Selectivity
(Wed Apr 30 2003 - 15:59:11 CEST)
Selectivity
(Wed Apr 30 2003 - 11:24:09 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Thu Apr 10 2003 - 10:22:03 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Wed Apr 09 2003 - 10:56:25 CEST)
hakan ferhatosmanoglu
CFP: ODBASE 2003
(Tue Apr 15 2003 - 20:24:17 CEST)
CFP: DOA 2003
(Tue Apr 15 2003 - 19:15:35 CEST)
CFP: COOPIS 2003
(Tue Apr 15 2003 - 19:13:58 CEST)
harvey1
Re: EER and ORM data modelling
(Wed Apr 16 2003 - 21:47:15 CEST)
Howard J. Rogers
Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site
(Wed Apr 09 2003 - 00:21:24 CEST)
Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site
(Tue Apr 08 2003 - 13:52:54 CEST)
Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site
(Tue Apr 08 2003 - 10:48:29 CEST)
Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site
(Tue Apr 08 2003 - 03:43:53 CEST)
Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site
(Mon Apr 07 2003 - 10:48:22 CEST)
Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site
(Mon Apr 07 2003 - 09:04:17 CEST)
Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site
(Sun Apr 06 2003 - 04:16:57 CEST)
Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site
(Fri Apr 04 2003 - 19:33:13 CEST)
Howard Rogers
Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site
(Wed Apr 16 2003 - 03:47:21 CEST)
Ian
Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept?
(Fri Apr 25 2003 - 15:06:38 CEST)
Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept?
(Fri Apr 25 2003 - 12:56:02 CEST)
Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept?
(Thu Apr 24 2003 - 22:37:08 CEST)
Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept?
(Thu Apr 24 2003 - 15:18:28 CEST)
J Alex
Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site
(Tue Apr 29 2003 - 00:01:07 CEST)
Jeffrey Bailey
Re: One to One relationships
(Thu Apr 24 2003 - 20:43:27 CEST)
Re: One to One relationships
(Thu Apr 24 2003 - 16:45:47 CEST)
Jeffrey Hunter
Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site
(Tue Apr 22 2003 - 19:36:29 CEST)
Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site
(Tue Apr 08 2003 - 00:36:06 CEST)
Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site
(Mon Apr 07 2003 - 01:59:55 CEST)
Expanded Oracle DBA Site
(Thu Apr 03 2003 - 01:49:15 CEST)
Jeminem6069
Gateway To INternet SUccess
(Mon Apr 21 2003 - 21:17:19 CEST)
Jeremy
Re: PL/SQL Server Pages
(Tue Apr 08 2003 - 18:37:46 CEST)
Jerry Gitomer
Re: student question
(Tue Apr 01 2003 - 06:53:49 CEST)
Joe \
Re: Expressing SQL in relational algebra
(Thu Apr 10 2003 - 19:23:40 CEST)
Joel Garry
Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site
(Fri Apr 25 2003 - 02:39:39 CEST)
Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site
(Thu Apr 24 2003 - 15:43:57 CEST)
Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site
(Wed Apr 23 2003 - 01:47:02 CEST)
Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site
(Tue Apr 08 2003 - 00:07:04 CEST)
Johann Sander
Re: Are DOMAINs part of SQL-99 standard?
(Tue Apr 08 2003 - 08:47:24 CEST)
Are DOMAINs part of SQL-99 standard?
(Fri Apr 04 2003 - 17:28:46 CEST)
John
Re: primary ID trick: speed/disk space?
(Wed Apr 30 2003 - 20:05:11 CEST)
Help with a query please
(Wed Apr 23 2003 - 00:03:19 CEST)
John A. Mason
Re: One to One relationships
(Wed Apr 30 2003 - 01:31:26 CEST)
John Maloney
Accounting ERD
(Sat Apr 26 2003 - 01:01:27 CEST)
John Russell
Re: PL/SQL Server Pages
(Wed Apr 09 2003 - 06:33:05 CEST)
Jonathan Leffler
"Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss
(Tue Apr 29 2003 - 08:06:56 CEST)
Joseph Gallegos
student question
(Tue Apr 01 2003 - 00:09:34 CEST)
Kamal
Re: newton binomial coefficient
(Wed Apr 02 2003 - 11:46:01 CEST)
newton binomial coefficient
(Tue Apr 01 2003 - 18:49:03 CEST)
karl wettin
name conflicts in rdbms
(Tue Apr 29 2003 - 03:20:08 CEST)
Ken
Primary key and requirement
(Sun Apr 20 2003 - 02:01:12 CEST)
Kenneth Downs
Re: Accounting ERD
(Mon Apr 28 2003 - 02:53:25 CEST)
Re: Accounting ERD
(Sun Apr 27 2003 - 18:40:21 CEST)
kieferandreas
Re: kdb-tree implementation
(Wed Apr 02 2003 - 02:17:22 CEST)
kdb-tree implementation
(Tue Apr 01 2003 - 22:17:05 CEST)
Krishna
Serialization and 2PL
(Fri Apr 04 2003 - 11:08:25 CEST)
Larry Coon
Re: FK -> non PK - bad design?
(Fri Apr 11 2003 - 19:04:40 CEST)
Re: FK -> non PK - bad design?
(Fri Apr 11 2003 - 18:53:02 CEST)
Re: FK -> non PK - bad design?
(Wed Apr 09 2003 - 20:43:10 CEST)
Lauri Pietarinen
Re: Problems with SELECT *
(Wed Apr 30 2003 - 09:17:50 CEST)
Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept?
(Mon Apr 28 2003 - 09:59:13 CEST)
Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept?
(Sun Apr 27 2003 - 21:38:11 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Fri Apr 04 2003 - 16:37:09 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Thu Apr 03 2003 - 09:44:26 CEST)
Lennart Jonsson
Re: FK -> non PK - bad design?
(Wed Apr 09 2003 - 05:29:13 CEST)
lorabanks
))) USB Mass Storage Device (((
(Fri Apr 18 2003 - 01:36:52 CEST)
lshepstone
Re: Celko: short book on the nested sets model for trees.
(Mon Apr 07 2003 - 13:33:13 CEST)
macmac38
Re: Celko: short book on the nested sets model for trees.
(Fri Apr 04 2003 - 15:33:53 CEST)
Marshall Spight
Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept?
(Wed Apr 30 2003 - 17:47:09 CEST)
Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept?
(Wed Apr 30 2003 - 05:35:50 CEST)
Re: Transactions: good or bad?
(Wed Apr 30 2003 - 05:33:37 CEST)
Transactions: good or bad?
(Tue Apr 29 2003 - 08:00:53 CEST)
Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept?
(Tue Apr 29 2003 - 07:48:27 CEST)
Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept?
(Tue Apr 29 2003 - 07:38:56 CEST)
Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept?
(Mon Apr 28 2003 - 08:31:53 CEST)
Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept?
(Mon Apr 28 2003 - 07:58:17 CEST)
Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept?
(Sat Apr 26 2003 - 21:36:22 CEST)
Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept?
(Sat Apr 26 2003 - 04:14:57 CEST)
Re: One to One relationships
(Sat Apr 26 2003 - 03:58:30 CEST)
Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept?
(Fri Apr 25 2003 - 06:49:36 CEST)
Re: Primary key and requirement
(Sun Apr 20 2003 - 06:03:02 CEST)
Re: Primary Keys and Foreign Keys
(Mon Apr 14 2003 - 17:18:51 CEST)
Re: When should stuff be stored in a database?
(Mon Apr 14 2003 - 09:01:27 CEST)
Re: FK -> non PK - bad design?
(Mon Apr 14 2003 - 08:52:01 CEST)
Re: FK -> non PK - bad design?
(Sat Apr 12 2003 - 06:39:40 CEST)
Re: FK -> non PK - bad design?
(Sat Apr 12 2003 - 06:34:31 CEST)
Re: FK -> non PK - bad design?
(Fri Apr 11 2003 - 06:42:04 CEST)
Mary Watson
This is soooo cool
(Wed Apr 30 2003 - 03:00:50 CEST)
MHM49
Which Database Program For Me?
(Sun Apr 13 2003 - 03:14:16 CEST)
Michael Sterling
getting the maximum from multiple returns
(Thu Apr 24 2003 - 15:51:11 CEST)
Mike
Relation model in Access, Need some info..
(Tue Apr 29 2003 - 08:28:57 CEST)
Re: FK -> non PK - bad design?
(Sat Apr 12 2003 - 09:02:43 CEST)
Re: FK -> non PK - bad design?
(Fri Apr 11 2003 - 21:19:34 CEST)
Re: FK -> non PK - bad design?
(Fri Apr 11 2003 - 21:04:35 CEST)
Re: Is multi-type data in one field normal?
(Fri Apr 11 2003 - 14:30:12 CEST)
Re: Is multi-type data in one field normal?
(Fri Apr 11 2003 - 12:59:36 CEST)
Re: Is multi-type data in one field normal?
(Fri Apr 11 2003 - 12:28:20 CEST)
Re: Is multi-type data in one field normal?
(Fri Apr 11 2003 - 01:17:12 CEST)
Re: Is multi-type data in one field normal?
(Thu Apr 10 2003 - 22:54:43 CEST)
Is multi-type data in one field normal?
(Thu Apr 10 2003 - 11:09:10 CEST)
Mike Sherrill
Re: Table design problem
(Mon Apr 21 2003 - 21:16:34 CEST)
Re: FK -> non PK - bad design?
(Tue Apr 15 2003 - 23:59:35 CEST)
Re: Primary Keys and Foreign Keys
(Tue Apr 15 2003 - 23:59:33 CEST)
Re: Table design problem
(Tue Apr 15 2003 - 23:59:24 CEST)
Re: Table design problem
(Tue Apr 08 2003 - 06:24:38 CEST)
Mikito Harakiri
Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss
(Wed Apr 30 2003 - 23:59:19 CEST)
Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss
(Wed Apr 30 2003 - 20:52:08 CEST)
Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss
(Wed Apr 30 2003 - 00:04:16 CEST)
Re: XML extensions to SQL
(Fri Apr 18 2003 - 22:41:49 CEST)
Re: XML extensions to SQL
(Fri Apr 18 2003 - 22:22:29 CEST)
XML extensions to SQL
(Fri Apr 18 2003 - 18:56:01 CEST)
Re: Is multi-type data in one field normal?
(Fri Apr 11 2003 - 23:06:51 CEST)
Re: Is multi-type data in one field normal?
(Fri Apr 11 2003 - 18:45:44 CEST)
Re: Is multi-type data in one field normal?
(Fri Apr 11 2003 - 08:24:22 CEST)
Re: And the correct answer is?
(Fri Apr 04 2003 - 01:22:20 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Wed Apr 02 2003 - 20:02:55 CEST)
Re: newton binomial coefficient
(Wed Apr 02 2003 - 19:28:43 CEST)
Re: newton binomial coefficient
(Tue Apr 01 2003 - 20:19:44 CEST)
Mirko Koenig
Re: newbie: using id's or total desciption
(Fri Apr 25 2003 - 19:01:46 CEST)
Re: newbie: using id's or total desciption
(Fri Apr 25 2003 - 00:05:44 CEST)
newbie: using id's or total desciption
(Thu Apr 24 2003 - 18:10:01 CEST)
Monte Gardner
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Tue Apr 08 2003 - 20:48:51 CEST)
Morten Gulbrandsen
General Question about ANSI/X3/SPARC DBMS Architecture
(Thu Apr 24 2003 - 12:13:51 CEST)
n_vijay_anand
Re: simple database
(Wed Apr 09 2003 - 05:32:56 CEST)
simple database
(Tue Apr 08 2003 - 14:19:06 CEST)
Neo
Re: Expressing SQL in relational algebra
(Thu Apr 10 2003 - 17:35:44 CEST)
Re: Expressing SQL in relational algebra
(Thu Apr 10 2003 - 07:11:58 CEST)
Re: Expressing SQL in relational algebra
(Thu Apr 10 2003 - 06:13:17 CEST)
Re: Expressing SQL in relational algebra
(Wed Apr 09 2003 - 21:35:43 CEST)
Re: Expressing SQL in relational algebra
(Tue Apr 08 2003 - 18:45:30 CEST)
Re: Expressing SQL in relational algebra
(Mon Apr 07 2003 - 22:03:28 CEST)
Re: Expressing SQL in relational algebra
(Mon Apr 07 2003 - 21:40:51 CEST)
Niall Litchfield
Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site
(Sun Apr 06 2003 - 22:15:48 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Tue Apr 01 2003 - 15:20:34 CEST)
nospam
SQL string to INSERT into an associative table?
(Wed Apr 30 2003 - 07:52:56 CEST)
Nuno Souto
Re: PL/SQL Server Pages
(Wed Apr 09 2003 - 02:43:59 CEST)
OtisUsenet
Re: FK -> non PK - bad design?
(Wed Apr 09 2003 - 16:41:08 CEST)
FK -> non PK - bad design?
(Tue Apr 08 2003 - 06:55:19 CEST)
Pablo Sanchez
Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss
(Wed Apr 30 2003 - 15:49:19 CEST)
Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site
(Mon Apr 07 2003 - 02:53:49 CEST)
Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site
(Sun Apr 06 2003 - 05:08:16 CEST)
Paul
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Tue Apr 01 2003 - 03:21:39 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Thu Apr 10 2003 - 04:06:36 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Thu Apr 10 2003 - 01:57:43 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Mon Apr 07 2003 - 19:18:50 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Mon Apr 07 2003 - 15:32:38 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Fri Apr 04 2003 - 21:19:09 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Fri Apr 04 2003 - 21:13:56 CEST)
Re: Expressing SQL in relational algebra
(Tue Apr 01 2003 - 17:04:43 CEST)
Re: Expressing SQL in relational algebra
(Tue Apr 01 2003 - 17:04:34 CEST)
Paul Brewer
Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site
(Tue Apr 08 2003 - 22:52:15 CEST)
Paul Drake
Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site
(Wed Apr 23 2003 - 08:56:50 CEST)
Paul Linehan
When should stuff be stored in a database?
(Mon Apr 14 2003 - 03:53:52 CEST)
Putting indices on tables - PK's, FK's and all the rest?
(Mon Apr 14 2003 - 03:47:59 CEST)
Paul Vernon
Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss
(Wed Apr 30 2003 - 20:39:51 CEST)
Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss
(Wed Apr 30 2003 - 20:19:28 CEST)
Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss
(Wed Apr 30 2003 - 20:17:05 CEST)
Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss
(Tue Apr 29 2003 - 21:47:28 CEST)
Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss
(Tue Apr 29 2003 - 12:13:53 CEST)
Re: Transactions: good or bad?
(Tue Apr 29 2003 - 12:21:08 CEST)
Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept?
(Tue Apr 29 2003 - 12:02:46 CEST)
Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept?
(Tue Apr 29 2003 - 12:04:38 CEST)
Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept?
(Mon Apr 28 2003 - 19:45:51 CEST)
Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept?
(Mon Apr 28 2003 - 15:54:07 CEST)
Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept?
(Mon Apr 28 2003 - 01:02:49 CEST)
Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept?
(Mon Apr 28 2003 - 00:34:13 CEST)
Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept?
(Sun Apr 27 2003 - 23:40:20 CEST)
Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept?
(Sat Apr 26 2003 - 19:38:14 CEST)
Re: Do Data Models Need to built on a Mathematical Concept?
(Sat Apr 26 2003 - 19:33:52 CEST)
Re: How to cope with missing values - NULLS?
(Fri Apr 25 2003 - 11:57:01 CEST)
Re: One to One relationships
(Thu Apr 24 2003 - 17:33:08 CEST)
Re: How to cope with missing values - NULLS?
(Wed Apr 23 2003 - 14:41:17 CEST)
Re: How to cope with missing values - NULLS?
(Tue Apr 22 2003 - 19:27:43 CEST)
Re: How to cope with missing values - NULLS?
(Mon Apr 21 2003 - 23:59:23 CEST)
Re: How to cope with missing values - NULLS?
(Sat Apr 19 2003 - 23:40:33 CEST)
Re: XML extensions to SQL
(Sun Apr 20 2003 - 00:17:04 CEST)
Re: Who invitented the division operator in relational algebra and why?
(Tue Apr 15 2003 - 14:23:21 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Wed Apr 02 2003 - 16:01:26 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Tue Apr 01 2003 - 16:38:07 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Tue Apr 01 2003 - 14:35:05 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Tue Apr 01 2003 - 12:38:20 CEST)
PaulGauthier
Re: Problems with SELECT *
(Wed Apr 30 2003 - 04:02:18 CEST)
Peter Gulutzan
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Tue Apr 15 2003 - 20:55:32 CEST)
Peter Koch Larsen
Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss
(Wed Apr 30 2003 - 10:03:11 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type - What is really Boolean and what is not?
(Fri Apr 25 2003 - 12:19:12 CEST)
Re: How to cope with missing values - NULLS?
(Thu Apr 24 2003 - 18:51:31 CEST)
Re: How to cope with missing values - NULLS?
(Wed Apr 23 2003 - 00:40:49 CEST)
Re: How to cope with missing values - NULLS?
(Tue Apr 22 2003 - 18:18:25 CEST)
Re: How to cope with missing values - NULLS?
(Mon Apr 21 2003 - 20:52:46 CEST)
Re: How to cope with missing values - NULLS?
(Mon Apr 21 2003 - 17:17:04 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type - What is really Boolean and what is not?
(Mon Apr 21 2003 - 17:07:35 CEST)
Re: How to cope with missing values - NULLS?
(Sat Apr 19 2003 - 00:45:11 CEST)
How to cope with missing values - NULLS?
(Fri Apr 18 2003 - 17:17:45 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Fri Apr 18 2003 - 17:15:26 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Wed Apr 16 2003 - 01:53:35 CEST)
programmer
Re: newton binomial coefficient
(Wed Apr 02 2003 - 12:39:19 CEST)
Qingqing Zhou
Re: Putting indices on tables - PK's, FK's and all the rest?
(Mon Apr 14 2003 - 05:16:47 CEST)
Re: kdb-tree implementation
(Wed Apr 02 2003 - 06:13:25 CEST)
Re: kdb-tree implementation
(Wed Apr 02 2003 - 00:26:14 CEST)
Rich Dillon
Re: One to One relationships
(Sat Apr 26 2003 - 22:52:43 CEST)
Richard Wheeldon
Re: XML extensions to SQL
(Sat Apr 19 2003 - 00:25:15 CEST)
Re: XML extensions to SQL
(Fri Apr 18 2003 - 20:59:32 CEST)
Re: When should stuff be stored in a database?
(Mon Apr 14 2003 - 23:29:26 CEST)
Robert Sundström
Re: Transactions: good or bad?
(Tue Apr 29 2003 - 11:29:00 CEST)
Roy Hann
Re: Table design problem
(Tue Apr 22 2003 - 10:53:02 CEST)
Re: Table design problem
(Thu Apr 17 2003 - 12:14:25 CEST)
Re: Table design problem
(Tue Apr 08 2003 - 17:07:24 CEST)
Sarah Billings
Re: Expanded Oracle DBA Site
(Sat Apr 26 2003 - 14:30:46 CEST)
shay
Re: PL/SQL Server Pages
(Wed Apr 09 2003 - 01:27:27 CEST)
Stephen J. Fromm
Re: primary ID trick: speed/disk space?
(Wed Apr 30 2003 - 23:53:45 CEST)
primary ID trick: speed/disk space?
(Mon Apr 28 2003 - 16:32:44 CEST)
M:N relationship with canonical pairing
(Mon Apr 28 2003 - 16:23:32 CEST)
Steve Kass
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Sat Apr 12 2003 - 22:56:14 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Thu Apr 10 2003 - 09:07:41 CEST)
stu
Re: newbie: using id's or total desciption
(Fri Apr 25 2003 - 10:17:41 CEST)
Re: One to One relationships
(Fri Apr 25 2003 - 10:07:22 CEST)
One to One relationships
(Thu Apr 24 2003 - 16:10:50 CEST)
Discussion Forum Design
(Thu Apr 24 2003 - 15:31:53 CEST)
The Countess
Undervalued Equity-Rising
(Tue Apr 08 2003 - 18:21:29 CEST)
Tibor Karaszi
Re: Are DOMAINs part of SQL-99 standard?
(Sun Apr 06 2003 - 12:54:39 CEST)
Tim X
Re: PL/SQL Server Pages
(Wed Apr 09 2003 - 12:19:03 CEST)
Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Wed Apr 09 2003 - 20:42:36 CEST)
Tony
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Tue Apr 01 2003 - 11:50:21 CEST)
Troels Arvin
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Mon Apr 14 2003 - 18:18:00 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Sat Apr 12 2003 - 15:54:43 CEST)
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Tue Apr 01 2003 - 16:00:43 CEST)
Trooper
Re: Database table "triangle"... allowed or not
(Sun Apr 06 2003 - 18:07:02 CEST)
Database table "triangle"... allowed or not
(Sun Apr 06 2003 - 03:51:04 CEST)
Undercover Elephant
Re: XML extensions to SQL
(Fri Apr 18 2003 - 22:08:02 CEST)
XML Database Symposium at VLDB 2003
(Thu Apr 17 2003 - 19:49:42 CEST)
Victor
Re: PL/SQL Server Pages
(Wed Apr 09 2003 - 16:51:43 CEST)
WangKhar
Re: The BOOLEAN data type
(Wed Apr 02 2003 - 11:46:10 CEST)
Last message date
:
Wed Apr 30 2003 - 23:59:19 CEST
Archived on
: Sun Jun 26 2016 - 10:58:40 CEST
412 messages
sort by
: [
thread
] [ author ] [
date
] [
subject
]
Nearby
: [
About this archive
] [
Other mail archives
]
.::
Blogger Home
::
Wiki Home
::
Forum Home
::
Privacy
::
Contact
::.
