Re: db2 vs oracle
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 19:09:34 GMT
Message-ID: <OL4Yc.61683$9d6.51287_at_attbi_s54>
So I guess years of using and having experience with Oracle, DB2, Ingres,
Sybase, Sql Server, XDB, SQL Base (Centura), Btrive, dBase (padadox,
CLipper, Foxpro),my SQL, Isam and others is just too narrow an experience.
I as far as I remember Goob is a pile of mess of buggers. At least my kids
say so.
Jim
"Data Goob" <datagoob_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Zs4Yc.1$QY2.0_at_fe55.usenetserver.com...
> Jim,
>
> Thanks for your comments. I disagree that I'm 'completely' wrong, but it
> doesn't really matter, I'm not using Oracle. Oracle is a beast of a pig
> all the way around, but you would only know that if you used something
> besides Oracle. Oracle has excellent marketing, pay no attention to the
> man behind the curtain.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Jim Kennedy wrote:
> >
> >
> > You know not what you write about. I worked for a company that included
> > Oracle as the database for an Electronic Medical Records company who's
main
> > customers were ambulatory care centers. (Your standard Dr.'s office)
The
> > customer did not need nor did they have a DBA or even an IS department
on
> > staff. Someone who was desktop savy could install the whole system from
the
> > excellent step by step documentation. (we started on Oracle 7.1 which
was
> > current at the time) People ran it for many years without a problem and
as
> > long as they followed the procedures in our manual (eg backup, hot or
cold)
> > then they didn't have any problems even if they had to restore. They
> > usually called us for restores. We were installed at several thousand
sites
> > all across the US. Dr. offices are very cheap and they did not
willingly
> > hire people just to administer the system. We supported Oracle running
on a
> > variety of platforms. (Netware, NT, HPUX, and if we had a larger QA
> > department could have easily supported Sun and AIX. QA, understandably,
> > wanted to run complete regression passes for every platform. With about
150
> > employees in the entire company at the time, there were just not enough
> > resources to reasonably do it.)
> >
> > So one can set things up incorrectly and cause all sorts of headaches
and
> > make work, but if you take a little care and set it up right you don't
have
> > to spend time screwing around.
> >
> > So you are completely wrong. Oracle has gotten easier to administer
since
> > 7.1.
> > Jim
> >
>
>
Received on Sat Aug 28 2004 - 21:09:34 CEST