Re: Company thought DB2 will be better than Oracle.
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 12:07:45 +0100
Message-ID: <bk1hph$nvml7$1_at_ID-64669.news.uni-berlin.de>
DBA wrote:
> You can't compare choosing IBM vs. choosing Informix. IBM is not likely to
Not in the UK they're not.
However, I would like to point out that a lot of people *did* choose
Informix over DB2, and they typically did this for several reasons:
They did all this despite the fact that Informix's market share had eroded
over the years.
The car analogy doesn't really work in this case, because there are other
factors that influence a car purchase. I, for example, drive a very large
BMW because I have a very small willy. Market share played no part in my
decision, only the desire for a large, throbbing, thrusting ... car. Ahem.
No database vendor markets to that sector of the market, AFAIK. (Although I
haven't been playing close attention to Oracle's marketing lately, to be
fair, they have probably got this base covered too.)
However, market share *is* important for ISVs and third party developers --
they are reluctant to develop on and support a platform that doesn't give
> go out of business or be taken over by another company. The market share
> #'s are much closer than you indicate.
Informix was hugely popular in the ISV space despite a less than massive market share, because they made it easy to do business with them, something I've found can only be said about IBM with your fingers crossed behind your back.
-- "C'est pas parce qu'on n'a rien à dire qu'il faut fermer sa gueule" - ColucheReceived on Sun Sep 14 2003 - 13:07:45 CEST