Re: Query Performance Problem
Date: 29 Jul 2002 01:26:43 -0700
Message-ID: <e7d269ce.0207290026.4749b76e_at_posting.google.com>
I have indexes on the relevant columns.
But is it really better to have indexes rather than do a FTS? I
remember keep reading somewhere that says when the query retrieves
more than a certain percentage of the table, then the FTS is to be
preferred.
"Steve M" <steve.mcdaniels_at_vuinteractive.com> wrote in message news:<ahn9ab$t69$1_at_spiney.sierra.com>...
> Which version of Oracle?
>
>
> You need to "trick" the optimizer into using the indexes and tables in
> the order you want.
>
> Some ways to do this:
>
> 1) Evaluate your execution plan with and without the tables being analyzed.
> 2) use hints to suggest indexes to use first, second, etc.
> 3) change the order of the tables in your FROM clause.
> 4) change the multiblock_read_count (initSID.ora)
> 5) force the optimzer into believing that indexes are more likely to be in
> cache
> (see documentation on "optimizer_index_cost_adj" and
> "optimizer_index_caching")
>
> I suggest these things believing that you've alread built indexes on the
> relevant fields.
> If you haven't, well, then as Gilda would say: Never Mind.
>
Received on Mon Jul 29 2002 - 10:26:43 CEST