Re: More benchmark bullshit, and Linux luser mating calls... (was Re: Linux betas NT in TPC testing, running Oracle8
Date: Sun, 02 May 1999 10:03:37 GMT
Message-ID: <373121cc.3352602_at_news.demon.co.uk>
On Sat, 01 May 1999 15:55:03 GMT, cbbrowne_at_news.brownes.org (Christopher B. Browne) wrote:
>On Sat, 01 May 1999 15:20:35 GMT, Anthony Ord
><nws_at_rollingthunder.demon.co.uk> posted:
>>If you free no 714 then try to access it with a pointer you
>>should get a SEGV (sometimes).
>
>No, if you're using an array to implement a linked list, then if you
>"free" entry #714, then you aren't changing the array, but rather
>something in a separate data structure independent of the array.
If I'm using an array, then I'm not accessing with a pointer. "Free" was actually the opposite of "new" in that context.
>In effect, you *can't* free #714; that's a position in a fixed array
>that you defined. You can't get rid of #714 without getting rid of
>everything from #714 to the end of the array.
I agree.
>There may be need to worry aboug SEGV when looking at whatever the
>contents of #714 pointed to, although if that too is in an array, not
>necessarily so.
I view SEGV as a debugging tool rather than a problem.
>The point here is that if you're using arrays, the array management
>code can probably find out-of-bound situations *MORE* successfully and
>accurately than can the memory manager. There's no need for SEGV
>unless the array manager decides to fail. Or if you're working with a
>language like C, where arrays are somewhat simulated objects, and
>there's no "array manager."
But why bother? If you are out-of-bounds with Pascal, or if you try to read a freed pointer, the same thing happens. Your program dies. Pointers are arguable more effective as they also trap in-of-bounds errors, which the array wouldn't.
>In my FORTH days, I used both array schemes that included bounds
>checkers, and array schemes that didn't. If there's no bounds
>checker, then you run the risk of SEGV. If there is, then there's no
>such risk.
What happens when the bounds checker triggers? Does your program stop?
Regards
Anthony
-- ----------------------------------------- | And when our worlds | | They fall apart | | When the walls come tumbling in | | Though we may deserve it | | It will be worth it - Depeche Mode | -----------------------------------------Received on Sun May 02 1999 - 12:03:37 CEST