Re: sql*net on lan or local drive?

From: Francisco Piragibe <piragibe_at_esquadro.com.br>
Date: 1996/06/10
Message-ID: <4phkqr$q6b_at_ls00.esquadro.com.br>#1/1


wheadonb_at_cadvision.com (Blair Wheadon) wrote:

>We are preparing to roll out a Forms 4.0 app to about 40 users, and
>would like some ideas on how similar apps are configured in your shop.
 

>Infrastructure:
>Netware 3.11
>Win 3.1
>16MB Pentiums on the desktop
>Novell TCP/IP stack
>10Mbps ethernet to the desktop
>Forms 4.0
 

>The .fmx files will be located on a network drive, and the question we
>are struggling with is where to put sql*net and the runform executable:
>local drive or network drive?
 

>With the software on the network drive opening new forms takes about
>2-5 seconds, while on local drive takes 1-2 seconds. GPFs are more
>common using the network drive setup, although I don't have specific
>stats to back me up.
 

>Supportability of software on the desktop is a big concern with rolling
>this out on the local drive.
 

>A related issue is that the application requires a 'LOCAL=' line in
>oracle.ini. Does this require a manual change to the oracle.ini file
>whenever one wants to connect to a different database?
>wishes to connect to. Regardless, we will be asking the vendor to
>update their app to function without a 'LOCAL=' line.
 

>Your comments are appreciated.
 

>Blair Wheadon
>wheadonb_at_cadvision.com
>wheadon_at_shell.ca

Blair

The LOCAL=.. line is a guide to the default database the application should connect to. The only way of getting around this line is hardcoding the name in the application, which is not usually a good idea. If you don't mind my making a suggestion, you shouldn't ask your supplier to do it.

As for network drives, they can really blow your bandwidth away if used excessively, once ORACLE tools modules are usually several megabytes large. I strongly recommend putting only the FMXs on network drives. After all, the ORACLE products executables are relatively stable modules, and you're not likely to spend most of you days upgrading this kind of software. Received on Mon Jun 10 1996 - 00:00:00 CEST

Original text of this message