Re: Does anyone think this group needs splitting into subgroups?

johnb_at_jbracken.demon.co.uk (John Bracken) wrote:

>gnilges_at_qni.com (Gary Nilges) wrote:
 

>>excellant idea, IMHO.
 

>>...gary
 

>>Clint Redwood <clint_at_kheldar.demon.co.uk> wrote:
 

>>>How about following subgroups?
 

>>>forms
>>>reports
>>>dba
>>>sql
>>>jobs
 

>>>etc...
 

>>>I'd certainly make this group easier to read!

>Yep I agree. Break it down, the Oracle spectrum of products spans too
>far a chasm for anyone to know all answers to all questions, and I'm
>getting a bit tired of downloading Mickey Mouse
>Developer/Discoverer/Designer questions which can be answered by 1)
>Phoning World Wide support (if you have a license) and 2) Questions
>which can be answered by RTFM.
 

>A good DBA forum would be nice with OCI and developer items moved into
>another group!

I agree! Received on Thu Feb 22 1996 - 00:00:00 CET