Re: Oracle Pro*C for Windows and OS/2?

From: MPower 'your future today' -- Mark Otero <mpower_at_ee.net>
Date: 1996/02/08
Message-ID: <4fdsg9$js_at_news.ee.net>#1/1


leipold_at_ACM.ORG (Walt Leipold) wrote:

>Help!
 

>We have an application which runs on Windows and OS/2, written using
>Borland C++ and embedded SQL for Watcom SQL. The embedded SQL is fairly
>simple, and looks just like the Pro*C I've written on Unix boxes. My
>client now wants us to modify the application to use his Oracle server
>database instead of a local Watcom database.
 

>Can we acquire Pro*C for Windows and OS/2, recompile our program, and
>then simply run it under SQL*Net? *Are* there even versions of Pro*C
>for Windows and OS/2? If so, will they build code that Borland C++
>will like? Is this gonna be a can of worms?
 

>E-mail replies gratefully accepted...
 

>Thanks!
 

>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>"Eddies in the space-time continuum!" Walt Leipold
>"And this is his sofa, is it?" leipold_at_acm.org
>------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi Walt,

Not at all. Yes, you can purchase Pro*C for Windows. I am not sure about OS/2, but I believe so, after all they do have an Oracle Server for OS/2. As for Windows your port should be straight forward. The precompiler comments out the EXECs and inserts the C calls to SQL*.DLL which in turn calls the Oracle OCI DLL -- ORA*.DLL. You will only need to adhere to the Borland C++ requirements for C.

Mark  


                       !!!!!
                      /'_at_ @'\

+---------------oOOo-----U-----oOOo---------------+
|   BigDaddy's Internet USENET FaxBack Service    |
|         'never leave home without it'           |
|                                                 |
| Mark Otero                        mpower_at_ee.net |
| MPower                        Your Future Today |
| 178 Beechbank Road               (614) 338-1550 |
| Columbus, Ohio 43213-1261    Fax (614) 338-1553 |
+-------------------------------------------------+
                     | |  | |
                    {__|  |__}
Received on Thu Feb 08 1996 - 00:00:00 CET

Original text of this message