Re: OCI vs. Pro*C
From: Hadar Paiss <hpaiss_at_netvision.net.il>
Date: 1996/01/31
Message-ID: <NEWTNews.823077819.3828.hpaiss_at_hadar.netvision.net.il>#1/1
Date: 1996/01/31
Message-ID: <NEWTNews.823077819.3828.hpaiss_at_hadar.netvision.net.il>#1/1
In article <james.lawrence.154.00097BB4_at_epamail.epa.gov>, writes:
>Subject: OCI vs. Pro*C
OCI claims to be faster.
Also there is one thing that I've figured that can be done only in OCI:
Allocating dynamic number of cursor at runtime. In PRO*C the number
of cursor to be used must be determined at PRE-COMPILE time, in OCI
one can allocate LDA at runtime.
If you don't need such a feature, use PRO*C, it is more readable
Hadar Received on Wed Jan 31 1996 - 00:00:00 CET