Re: *New* TPC-C price/performance record ($196)!

From: Olav Tollefsen <olavt_at_ksedb.no>
Date: 1995/12/02
Message-ID: <49pt97$gk3_at_oslo-nntp.eunet.no>


Some more information:

                AlphaServer system, Microsoft SQL server 
                       shatter performance record 

      Digital and Microsoft unveiled audited transaction benchmark results 
   that establish new records in the highly competitive market for database,    application and PC LAN servers.

      Breakthrough results of 3194.4 transactions per minute (tpmC) at    $196/tpmC, based on the TPC-C(2) benchmark Revision 3.0, were achieved on    the AlphaServer 2100 5/300 64-bit SMP system running Microsoft Windows NT    Server operating system V3.51 and Microsoft SQL Server V6.5 client/server    database management system. No other Microsoft SQL Server platform from any    system vendor delivers such impressive results.

      The 3194.4 at $196/tpmC result is the industry's best price/performance    using any system, any database, or any operating system. In fact, no other    system has ever come close to breaking the less-than-$200/tpmC barrier.

      With a total system cost of $626,102, the AlphaServer 2100 5/300 delivers    transaction performance and price/performance superior to any other system    priced below $1 million -- 24% better throughput performance and $46/tpmC    less than its closest competitor, the Intel-based Compaq ProLiant 5/133    Model 2. It also provides better performance and price/performance than many    systems costing much more than $1 million (see charts below).

      The Digital/Microsoft combination even outperforms a Tandem Himalaya    K10000-16 system with 16 processors and costing $3.5 million. And compared    with competitive systems from IBM, HP, Sun, Bull, AT&T, and others, these    results are far superior.

      "These independent benchmark results again demonstrate the breakthrough    performance and affordability of the Alpha architecture," said Pauline Nist,    Digital vice president of the Alpha Server Business Segment. "For customers,    this represents the industry's best value in high-performance server    capabilities. It also further demonstrates the engineering achievements of    our strategic alliance with Microsoft."

       The TPC-C benchmark is the industry-standard test for measuring database    transaction processing performance and price/performance. The $/tpmC result    reflects the cost of acquisition and ownership of the system over a five-year    period, including hardware and software maintenance, software upgrades, and    extended warranties.

       The AlphaServer 2100 5/300 benchmark was conducted using three CPUs    and 2 gigabytes of memory. These results were achieved in a heterogeneous    computing environment, using Visigenics ODBC client software for SCO UNIX    running on Digital's Intel-based Prioris PC systems.

   Competitive Comparisons

   Price Performance                 tpmC     $/tpmC      total system cost 

 Digital AlphaServer 2100 5/300      3194.40  $196       $626,101
 Compaq ProLiant 4500 5/133-2        2454.97   242        593,216
 Digital AlphaServer 8400 5/300      9414.06   316      2,972,726
 Compaq ProLiant 4500 5/100-1        1516.77   319        484,108
 IBM RS/6000 PowerPC J30             3119.16   349      1,089,831
 HP 9000 K410                        3809.46   364      1,384,763

 Transaction throughput              tpmC     $/tpmC    total system cost

 HP 9000 K410                        3809.46  $364     $1,384,763
 Sun SPARCCenter 2000E               3534.20   495      1,751,004
 AT&T 3555/4-XP                      3312.70   587      1,942,593
 Digital AlphaServer 2100 5/300      3194.40   196        626,102
 IBM RS/6000 PowerPC J30             3119.16   349      1,089,831
 Tandem Himalaya K10000-16           3043.49  1160      3,529,520
 Bull ESCALA Deskside D401/8         2660.03   530      1,409,965
 Compaq ProLiant 45005/133-2         2454.97   242        593,216

-- 

- Olav Tollefsen
  • Microsoft Norway
    -
  • Nothing I have written here is in any way, shape, or form official
  • Microsoft policy or opinion, and should not be represented as such
  • when quoted here or in any other forum.
Received on Sat Dec 02 1995 - 00:00:00 CET

Original text of this message