Re: Asynchronous IO (UNIX)

From: Jeff Sharpe <jsharpe_at_inforamp.net>
Date: 1995/09/30
Message-ID: <jsharpe.12.000B2F44_at_inforamp.net>#1/1


In article <44i46k$cfc_at_pcnet2.pcnet.net> Paul Baumgartel <paulb_at_pcnet.com> writes:
>Path: inforamp.net!uunet.ca!news.uunet.ca!torn!spool.mu.edu!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!news.mathworks.com!news.kei.com!simtel!news.sprintlink.net!pcnet.com!usenet
>From: Paul Baumgartel <paulb_at_pcnet.com>
>Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle
>Subject: Re: Asynchronous IO (UNIX)
>Date: 30 Sep 1995 00:49:24 GMT
>Organization: PCNet -- Public Access Internet in Connecticut!
>Lines: 6
>Message-ID: <44i46k$cfc_at_pcnet2.pcnet.net>
>References: <44ba6u$7nk_at_mailhost.qsp.co.uk> <44fccs$rs_at_news.iis.com.br>
>NNTP-Posting-Host: ts1-pt9.pcnet.com
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.22 (Windows; I; 16bit)

>I don't think asynchronous I/O and the use of raw partitions are related. You can
>use async I/O with database files or raw partitions, if your OS is configured for
>it. Async I/O just means that the DBWR can have multiple writes outstanding at
>once; whether or not the writes go through the Unix filesystem cache doesn't matter.

Paul is right, I use Oracle on AIX and Async I/O has to be set. They are not using raw.

J. Received on Sat Sep 30 1995 - 00:00:00 CET

Original text of this message