Re: Q: What is wrong with Multi-thread server

From: <stowe_at_mcs.net>
Date: 1995/06/24
Message-ID: <3sh3st$r9_at_News1.mcs.com>#1/1


> hlu_at_Glue.umd.edu (Huarong Lu) writes:
> Dispatchers and servers start as expected. The problem is:
> select server from v$session;
> tells there are at most one session shown as SHARED, the rest are all
> shown as NONE (background processes shown as DEDICATED). What's wrong
> with MST servers ? Why session's server can be NONE ?

If they aren't connecting using SQL*Net 2.x, they require dedicated processes.   

>>>>
Michael Stowe
Constellation Engineering, Inc.
http://www.mcs.com/~stowe Received on Sat Jun 24 1995 - 00:00:00 CEST

Original text of this message