Re: defragmentation and Oracle v7...automagic??
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 94 15:20:47 PDT
Message-ID: <cXBmuc1w165w_at_vllyoak.resun.com>
Bruce,
When you say that V7 combines unused fragments, are you referring to a data block? TIA.
pihlab_at_cbr.hhcs.gov.au (Bruce Pihlamae) writes:
> In article <mike.41.02CAC96D_at_conant.com>, mike_at_conant.com (Michael V. Conant)
> > Sorry for the novice question, but I can't get an answer in my perusal of t
> > manuals....
> >
> > The Oracle FAQ mentions that v7 "automagically" defragments tables. To wha
> > extent is this true? (no pun intended).
> >
> > Are extents defragg'ed in a segment,
>
> No.
>
> > or is this referring to block chaining issues ?
>
> Block chaining issues are still only fixed by EXP/IMP or you could use ANALYZ
> to find out which row is chained and simply drop and reinsert the row again.
> Actually, 'simple' is not a good word to use when discussing chaining.
>
> > Does this "feature" eliminate the need for database export/import efforts?
>
> No.
>
> Oracle7 defragments tablespaces. Actually, all it does is, if it finds two o
> more adjacent unused fragments it simply combines them into one fragment. It
> does NOT move database objects (tables, indexes, etc) around to combine all
> unused space into a single fragment.
>
> I think SMON is the background process that wakes up and checks for fragments
Received on Sat Oct 22 1994 - 23:20:47 CET