Re: Oracle Installation Experiences
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 1994 19:01:06 GMT
Message-ID: <Cx7rHv.8pK_at_news.cern.ch>
dhuet_at_DHUET-PC wrote:
: > mitchj_at_VNET.IBM.COM wrote:
: > : The installation of the Oracle7 server was tedious and a labor
: > : intensive process. A significant amount of time was expended on
: > : preparation and system setup. For example, the product's entire
: > : directory structure had to be manually created and primed.
: As a systems engineer with Oracle that has installed on several different
: platforms, I will not deny that on some platforms there are installation
: problems. These arise from the fact that it is difficult to keep installation
: programs that are consistent across all platforms. The Oracle install group has
: been aware of the problem for some time, and has asked internal and external
: customers for opinions about how to improve these procedures. In my latest
: installations on mostly Unix platforms I have been pleased with the
: improvements.
There are some pretty obvious things that should be done to the oracle install procedures, like try them before they are shipped. I know that since you support a lot of platforms it is a big job, but hey, that's why they pay you so much money. Here are some other tips:
- separate the "installing" from the "customizing".
- check for prerequisites (like cobol or some wierd libraries)
- add some intelligence to the install scripts. (I ran one, it failed, and changed the permissions on my /etc directory to 600)
- totally replace that huge install guide with something usable.
- test the stuff on some real people.
I have to wonder if the horrible install stuff is a trick to sell oracle service hours. I doubt it, because even the oracle dudes can't install the product.
When it runs, it might run good, but the general feeling from our customers is this: "if the quality of the install program is this bad, is my data safe?"
-- MickReceived on Wed Oct 05 1994 - 20:01:06 CET