Re: Oracle access trough Excel
From: Richard D Holowczak <holowcza_at_andromeda.rutgers.edu>
Date: 3 Apr 94 02:34:33 GMT
Message-ID: <Apr.2.21.34.33.1994.1970_at_andromeda.rutgers.edu>
Date: 3 Apr 94 02:34:33 GMT
Message-ID: <Apr.2.21.34.33.1994.1970_at_andromeda.rutgers.edu>
Q10641_at_paccvm.corp.mot.com (Troy Tinnes) writes:
> I'm not saying these tools are bad. I'm just suggesting probably the
>most cost effective method. Even with these tools:
> 1. The user must understand the structure of
> the database
So now you have to educate ALL of your users on the database structure ? I don't know about your organization, but the shops I've been in would rather not tell everyone in the company where to find the payroll table. Have you looked at products like Business Objects ? User sees no database structure at all.
> 2. The user must know how to write queries in
> SQL anyway
Same comments. Users don't want to learn SQL. Some have no time, MIS might not have any time. Some simply can't learn this enough to be effective and may cause harm while learning. One must take these costs into account as well. Again, look at some of the newer products with "canned" queries and reports. MIS makes 'em and controls 'em. The users use then with simple point and click. The Business Objects product can be set up so the user sees no SQL at all. (I have no affiliation with the company) I agree that with Excel, starting from scratch one needs to know these things. Users can't be expected to learn and MIS can never hope to teach on such a large scale. Nothing changes the fact the SQL*Plus and SQL*Reportwriter are NOT end user tools. If they are, then please come to my job and teach 2,000 people how to use them (at low cost) - from secretaries to vice-presidents.
Rich Holowczak
Rutgers University
holowcza_at_andromeda.rutgers.edu
Received on Sun Apr 03 1994 - 04:34:33 CEST