Re: >Oracle's future
From: Andrew May CMIS <amay_at_colesmyer.com.au>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 94 22:34:54 GMT
Message-ID: <1994Mar22.223454.2137_at_colesmyer.com.au>
>
> 2, Oracle v6 had 26 maintenance releases. Oracle v7, on AIX, has had 16
> maintenance releases already. Does that sound stable to you?
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 94 22:34:54 GMT
Message-ID: <1994Mar22.223454.2137_at_colesmyer.com.au>
>I would just like to point out several things:
> 1, DB2/6000 is faster than Oracle v7, if Oracle doesn't use discrete trans.
You would hope that IBM's proprietary database on their proprietary box would run faster than any other. The figures I got from IBM are:
TPC-A on RISC system 6000 model 580 DB2/6000 - 125.64 TPSA Oracle 7 - 157.20 TPSA Note: Oracle used discrete transactions to get their result.
>
> 2, Oracle v6 had 26 maintenance releases. Oracle v7, on AIX, has had 16
> maintenance releases already. Does that sound stable to you?
I hope this clears up a few things.
Regards,
Andrew.
--
--------------------------------------*---------------------------------------
N. Andrew May. | Database Administrator
Coles-Myer Ltd | These are my humble opinions alone.
53 Hoddle Street, Collingwood, | Tel: +61 3 483 7389. Fax: 483 7381
Received on Tue Mar 22 1994 - 23:34:54 CET