Re: DBMS tools evaluation criteria (LONG)
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1993 21:38:00 GMT
Message-ID: <CAA1FC.K9K_at_eclipse.torolab.ibm.com>
In the article below you mentioned IBM's EE Database for OS/2. You may want to consider the more powerful 32-bit IBM's DB2 for OS/2.
In article <CA9rzA.16z_at_news2.cis.umn.edu> westrich_at_bingo.ncc.umn.edu () writes:
>In article <1993Jul1.131743.11039_at_almserv.uucp> aluart_at_fnma.COM writes:
>>
>>** Maybe you have a list of evaluation criteria just laying around that you'd be willing to
>> share with me?
>>
>
>We're currently choosing a back end and front end for our in-house DB
>development. Here's the current version of our evaluation criteria list.
>I'd be interested in peoples' comments on the completeness of the list,
>as well as whether I've gotten the "priority order straight".
>
< some stuff deleted >
>
>Oracle (UNIX or Netware)
>Gupta SQLBase (Netware)
>Sybase SQL Server (UNIX or Netware)
>Microsoft SQL Server (OS/2 or NT)
>IBM EE SQL Server (OS/2)
>Informix (UNIX)
>Netware SQL (Netware)
>Rdb (VAX/VMS)
>
< some stuff deleted >
>Thanks for anyone who read this far, especially for not flaming me for
>such a long post! Please reply by email; if there are sufficient replies
>I'll post a summary.
>
>-----------------
>Brian Westrich
>Nutrition Coordinating Center (NCC) internet: westrich_at_keystone.ncc.umn.edu
>University of Minnesota phone: (612) 627 4862
>--
>Brian Westrich
>Nutrition Coordinating Center (NCC) internet: westrich_at_keystone.ncc.umn.edu
>University of Minnesota phone: (612) 627 4862
Surendra K. Verma
DB2/* Development,
IBM Toronto Laboratory
Received on Fri Jul 16 1993 - 23:38:00 CEST