Re: SQL Net

From: Phil Scarr <prs9k_at_brain.med.virginia.edu>
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1993 12:25:48 GMT
Message-ID: <1993Jan9.122548.18050_at_murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>


In article <1993Jan8.225515.14297_at_digi.lonestar.org> mmittman_at_digi.lonestar.org (Michael Mittman) writes:
>
>My experience with SQL*Net is that it is a real dog when the darn
>thing is working.
>
>We have two databases on one machine (an Amdahl) which is partitioned to
>run UTS operating system (UNIX) and MVS operating system. The failure
>rate for SQL*Net when going from UTS to MVS has been far to great, it
>fails at least twice per month (far to great for a large corperation).
>
>Also, performance is a factor. SQL*Net's transfer rate is about 512k.

Could you be more specific here? 512k per what unit of time? Second, Minute, Hour?

>
>Check out other possible solutions FIRST (ie: TCP/IP).

SQL*Net USES tcp/ip for its transfer in installations with a tcp/ip network. What are you using? This might explain your slow transfer rates.

>
>Good Luck
>
>Michael Mittman
>QRA Software Metrics - Software Tools Development

        -Phil

-- 
PHIL SCARR        \      We are Microsoft...     /          (o) 804.243.0229
 University of    /     OS/2 is irrelevant.      \          (f) 804.243.0290
 Virginia,        \     UNIX is irrelevant.      /        prs9k_at_Virginia.EDU
 Neurosurgery     /     Openness is futile.      \     prs9k_at_Virginia.BITNET
 HP-UX is my life!\ Prepare to be assimilated... /   ...uunet!virginia!prs9k
Received on Sat Jan 09 1993 - 13:25:48 CET

Original text of this message