Re: SQL Net
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1993 12:25:48 GMT
Message-ID: <1993Jan9.122548.18050_at_murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
In article <1993Jan8.225515.14297_at_digi.lonestar.org> mmittman_at_digi.lonestar.org (Michael Mittman) writes:
>
>My experience with SQL*Net is that it is a real dog when the darn
>thing is working.
>
>We have two databases on one machine (an Amdahl) which is partitioned to
>run UTS operating system (UNIX) and MVS operating system. The failure
>rate for SQL*Net when going from UTS to MVS has been far to great, it
>fails at least twice per month (far to great for a large corperation).
>
>Also, performance is a factor. SQL*Net's transfer rate is about 512k.
Could you be more specific here? 512k per what unit of time? Second, Minute, Hour?
>
>Check out other possible solutions FIRST (ie: TCP/IP).
SQL*Net USES tcp/ip for its transfer in installations with a tcp/ip network. What are you using? This might explain your slow transfer rates.
>
>Good Luck
>
>Michael Mittman
>QRA Software Metrics - Software Tools Development
-Phil
-- PHIL SCARR \ We are Microsoft... / (o) 804.243.0229 University of / OS/2 is irrelevant. \ (f) 804.243.0290 Virginia, \ UNIX is irrelevant. / prs9k_at_Virginia.EDU Neurosurgery / Openness is futile. \ prs9k_at_Virginia.BITNET HP-UX is my life!\ Prepare to be assimilated... / ...uunet!virginia!prs9kReceived on Sat Jan 09 1993 - 13:25:48 CET