Re: Customization of SQL*Forms.

From: <jaakola_at_cc.helsinki.fi>
Date: 27 Aug 92 07:21:54 GMT
Message-ID: <1992Aug27.092154.1_at_cc.helsinki.fi>


In article <!-cn0-c.tcox_at_netcom.com>, tcox_at_netcom.com (Thomas Cox) writes:
> sinha_at_watson.bms.com (Anil Sinha) writes:

>>Many sites have written awk scripts ( in unix o/s) or 
>>other utilities to modify the ".inp" file. These utilities help to automate 
>>the customization procedure. 

>
> Ahah! The reason you're doing that is because... you modify
> your form (as above), and then for some reason you change some
> aspect of your CASE logical model and thus need to re-gen the
> form. And in CASE Generator v1 (for Forms) the re-gen stomps
> all over your customization work. Ouch.
>
> But using 'awk' should be unneccessary. Because... CASE
> Generator v2 for Forms no longer stomps on your customization
> work. It lets you re-generate nondestructively.
What does this 'nondestructively' mean? How generator v2 checks which parts have been hand-modified? What if the CASE logical model and hand-modifications contradict? Which change takes presedence? Can I specify that I want to keep this piece of hand-modification and replace this hand-modification with the changes implied by the new CASE model? Is the technique foolproof?

No, I don't have a manual at hand. Neither do I wish to hear any marketing vaporware - I would like to hear a precise technical answer, if possible.

> Tom Cox DoD #1776 '91 CB 750 Nighthawk tcox_at_netcom.netcom.com
> Yeah, I have a day job. They don't believe me any more than you do.

--
Juhani Jaakola
jaakola_at_cc.helsinki.fi
Received on Thu Aug 27 1992 - 09:21:54 CEST

Original text of this message