Re: Forms5/6i: any benefits using NAME_IN instead of bind variable ?

Jan Gelbrich wrote:

> OK, that´s an argument.
> But for a "normal" tiny PU or a Forms Trigger containing 20 lines ?
>
> "Fred van Nimwegen" <fred.vannimwegen_at_wanadoo.nl> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> news:407c41ae$0$64611$4a441750_at_news.wanadoo.nl...
>
>>In librarys Name_in and Copy are the only options. >>
No.

But as soon as you want something done dymanically (e.g. traverse a block, and find out what fields need what attribute(s) set), name_in is a powerful option.
If you ever get the opportunity to check out the code of Headstart 3.4, you'll see what I mean.

(for those wondering: Headstart were the templates for Designer/2000, back when it was called Des/2000)

-- 

Regards,
Frank van Bortel