Re: Is Oracle Forms worth sticking with anymore
From: Karsten Farrell <kfarrell_at_belgariad.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2002 21:22:34 GMT
Message-ID: <uaQG9.109$Xl5.3084535_at_newssvr13.news.prodigy.com>
>
> If you want C/S with forms9i, just make it:
>
> make -f ins_forms.mk f90runm
>
> but it is not supported
>
> A pity though, with what the customer pays, Oracle should easily be able
> to keep supporting C/S. All the functionality should still be there
> (the make proves it). Most applications run in-house, don't they? You'd
> better have a performant network with this web-architecture and the
> "light" clients.
But "thin" clients don't need to run on Windows ... and we all know how Larry Ellison (#2) feels about Bill Gates (#1) ... #2 probably wishes #1 was a sailor so #2 could beat the shorts off #1 in a yacht race. :) Received on Mon Dec 02 2002 - 22:22:34 CET
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2002 21:22:34 GMT
Message-ID: <uaQG9.109$Xl5.3084535_at_newssvr13.news.prodigy.com>
Gerard H. Pille wrote:
> Frank wrote:
>
>> rolospy wrote: >> >>> Are Oracle trying to get people onto JDeveloper rather than Oracle Forms >>> nowadays. >>> >>> Is there a roadmap for Forms anymore. There must be thousands of >>> companies >>> with applications written using Forms yet I get the impression that >>> it's old >>> hat and Java is what Oracle is pushing now. >>> >>> >> >> Apart from all the good advice on Java and monitoring Apps >> (eBusiness Suite), Forms is gonna be around for several years >> to come. Only, the CLient Server model is dropped; the latest >> release already supports Web forms only. >> Oracle has not beem very clear on the policy regarding Forms >> and/or Java - they have apologised for that. >> (to me - talk to Oracle Netherlands!) >> >> Grtz, Frank >>
>
> If you want C/S with forms9i, just make it:
>
> make -f ins_forms.mk f90runm
>
> but it is not supported
>
> A pity though, with what the customer pays, Oracle should easily be able
> to keep supporting C/S. All the functionality should still be there
> (the make proves it). Most applications run in-house, don't they? You'd
> better have a performant network with this web-architecture and the
> "light" clients.
But "thin" clients don't need to run on Windows ... and we all know how Larry Ellison (#2) feels about Bill Gates (#1) ... #2 probably wishes #1 was a sailor so #2 could beat the shorts off #1 in a yacht race. :) Received on Mon Dec 02 2002 - 22:22:34 CET
