Re: SQL Backtrack for Oracle vs. RMAN

which part is crap? NT or SQLBT?

"basrad_at_oraspec.ind" <daekw_at_yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<ai9eq5$at3$04$3_at_news.t-online.com>...
> you are paying to work with crap ???
> instead of using the right tools , aah you are on NT
>
> I will sell you my tool , just 555 mouseclicks per day and
> everything will be fine, no learning necessary just clicking
>
>
> "Wormie" <ordeith_at_coruscant.net> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> news:df31f670.0207260905.3e36be0e_at_posting.google.com...
> > At my company, we are big users of SQL Backtrack for our disaster
> > recovery of our Oracle databases (we also use if for Informix, MSSQL,
> > Sybase and Oracle NT).
> >
> > However, we are being forced (from the top) to show hard dollar ROI
> > for SQLBT in order to keep it as opposed to switching to RMAN (which
> > none of us want to do).
> >
> > Does anyone have any information on how SQL Backtrack is a better tool
> > vs. RMAN. Specifically, how we can realize a return on investment
> > using SQLBT, as opposed to using RMAN. It is difficult to do, since
> > disaster recovery is sort of like an insurance policy.
> >
> > Any input would be appreciated,
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > BTW, we are using Oracle 8.0.5 -> 8.1.7 on Sun and AIX.
Received on Tue Aug 13 2002 - 16:42:08 CEST