Re: NASA switches from Oracle to MySQL
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 23:58:49 -0500
Message-ID: <933jmq$2vud$1_at_msunews.cl.msu.edu>
"JoeB" <joeb_at_jagas.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3A54C4E8.483D2CB5_at_jagas.demon.co.uk...
> NASA switches from Oracle to MySQL.
>
> Software shift at NASA may herald similar switch by other government
> agencies.
> Are the days of number of ORACLE numbered?
> Plus, Oracle extends $1 million challenge to BEA users, but not Open
> Source Databases?
> Why?
>
> Read full story on http://www.computercontractor.net
>
[Quoted] [Quoted] MySQL is not a transactional database, so it doesn't even qualify for TCP [Quoted] benchmarks. A custom C to an ISAM file database is orders of magnitude [Quoted] faster than Oracle, and much faster than MySQL, but it still doesn't make it a good choice.
Look up the acronym ACID and you will see why MySQL is only good as a "toy" database.
[Quoted] Postgres is the closest thing to a real database in the Open Source community, and it is well below what would be considered acceptable for commercial use, and it would never past muster for critical data.
[Quoted] There are also some issues with Linux that make it a poor choice as a database platform. Linux lacks true raw I/O except through extensions such as from SGI and Red Hat (version 6EE). These kernel extensions bring Linux closer to the I/O performance of NT or Solaris, but not equal. With *identical* hardware, commercial databases actually run faster on Windows 2k than on Linux (usually by a factor of 2 or more for Oracle).
[Quoted] Open Source has its place. Databases is not one of those places yet. I use [Quoted] [Quoted] Linux daily as a testing and development platform. We also use it as our production web server, mail and news platforms. However, we wouldn't dream [Quoted] of using it for a production database. I have benchmarked Oracle on NT compared to Oracle on Linux, and my Linux box was twice the machine of the NT box. Oracle on NT was faster.
[Quoted] Our production database platform is Solaris, which has proven to one of the best choices as a database platform.
[Quoted] [Quoted] I am not slamming Open Source. I am only making the point that Open Source is *not* a panacea for all our computing woes.
Chris Weiss
Chief Scientist for Database Engineering
PureCarbon, Inc.
Received on Fri Jan 05 2001 - 05:58:49 CET