Re: why CLI(oci)?

From: <mikkrolewski_at_my-deja.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 01:09:14 GMT
Message-ID: <8ufhrn$s7n$1_at_nnrp1.deja.com>

In article <cDoO5.4234$OX4.40897_at_news2.bora.net>, "ChangWoo Park" <someone_at_example.com> wrote:
> compare esql(Pro*c) with CLI(oci)?(--;)
>
> i want a rationality to use CLI.
>
>
IMHO there are few reasons to oci. Generally the command line are more difficult to write due to the numerous parameters, etc. The only experience that appeared to work with OCI was using a library that overrode all of the OCI command and replaced them with more C++ like functions including streams.

The proc is generally more obvious with more flexibility. The compiler handles the ugly work -- you can concentrate on the good stuff.

Michael Krolewski

Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy. Received on Fri Nov 10 2000 - 02:09:14 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Pierre Charpenay: "Re: UNION and ORDER BY clause"
Previous message: David Fitzjarrell: "Re: Help: export - question"
In reply to: ChangWoo Park: "why CLI(oci)?"
In reply to ChangWoo Park: "why CLI(oci)?"
Next in thread: Pierre Charpenay: "Re: UNION and ORDER BY clause"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message