Re: What is better, ODBC or OO4O?
Date: Sat, 04 Dec 1999 03:46:26 GMT
Message-ID: <82a2qh$7o8$1_at_nnrp1.deja.com>
OO4O is by far the best product. If you want to know where the good OO4O discussion group is goto...
http://www.egroups.com/group/oo4ole/
You might want to try the new Oracle OLE DB (ADO) beta available from Oracle Technet. It will return server side cursors.
Oracle provides a OLE DB discussion group on Deja at...
http://f2.dejanews.com/oracletechnet/nonmembers/
Plus, there is a new book that was published November 28 from Wrox. It compares ADO and OO4O directly and finds OO4O the champ. The book's ISBN is 1861001789 : Visual Basic Oracle 8 Programmer's Refernce.
Good Luck!
Zane E
In article <820htm$4jc$1_at_news1.xs4all.nl>,
Wouter <wsh_at_xs3.xs4all.nl> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We are migrating from Sybase to Oracle. Our NT applications use ADO
(with odbc).
> However we're having problems with ODBC and Oracle: Stored procedures
with a ref
> cursor as input or output parameter is only supported if the stored
procedure
> is defined in a package. The only ODBC driver that does not have this
limitation
> is the one from intersolve (merant), however this driver is very
expensive.
>
> So we are looking at alternatives, and we would like to know if
anybody has any
> experience with OO4O, compared to ODBC (with ADO). I don't see much
about OO4O
> in newsgroups, is this because 0040 is perfect, or because is sucks?
>
> We want to use it for multitier (and multithreaded) applications.
>
> Any advice or pointer to information about the subject is welcome!
>
> Thanks, Wouter
>
> --
> wsh_at_xs4all.nl
>
>
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
Received on Sat Dec 04 1999 - 04:46:26 CET