Re: Definition of a Leap Year????

From: Tom Cooke <tom_at_tomcooke.demon.co.uk>
Date: 1997/06/30
Message-ID: <gQdvsAACABuzEwR0_at_tomcooke.demon.co.uk>#1/1


Eh? Check out any Year 2000 White Paper... My definition is

  1. If it is divisible by four, it is a leap year

Unless (2) it is divisible by 100 in which case it is _not_

UNLESS (3) it is divisible by 1000 in which case it IS! Hence 29th February 2000 exists!

Anybody want to differ?

In article <r5Z1WGA+pXszEwCx_at_pbrewer.demon.co.uk>, Paul Brewer <paulb_at_pbrewer.demon.co.uk> writes
>In article <5orcf2$v6m_at_lantana.singnet.com.sg>, Seah Yong Seng
><ysseah_at_mbox2.singnet.com.sg> writes
>>Any body can help me regarding the abovementioned topic!!!
>>
>>What is the definition of a Leap Year?
>>Is it able to divisible by 4 is a Leap Year?
>>Is it a centry (1700, 1800, 1900, 2000) not a Leap Year?
>>Is it centry that able to divisible by 400 a Leap Year?
>>
>>Please help me, as I need to know inorder to differentiate whether year
>>2000 is a Leap Year?
>>
>>Thanks if you can help me.
>>
>>Rgds,
>>YSSEAH
>As I understand it, a year (Gregorian calendar) is a leap year if it's
>divisible by 4, _unless_ it's divisible by 400.
>Thus, 2000 will not be a leap year, although according to the press,
>many will jump ;-)
>Hope this helps - if it doesn't, doubtless other contributors will.
>Paul Brewer
 

-- 
Tom Cooke
Received on Mon Jun 30 1997 - 00:00:00 CEST

Original text of this message