Re: The query seems efficient - why poor performance?

From: vsevolod afanassiev <vsevolod.afanassiev_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 16:15:48 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <95846ce2-1192-450b-94d9-e6710eb7ef77_at_googlegroups.com>

Yes, the plan is the same - at least this is what Statspack says. It used a different plan for a while, but then it went back to the original plan. Received on Tue Jul 01 2014 - 01:15:48 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: ddf: "Re: The query seems efficient - why poor performance?"
Next in thread: ddf: "Re: The query seems efficient - why poor performance?"
Maybe reply: ddf: "Re: The query seems efficient - why poor performance?"
Reply: Mladen Gogala: "Re: The query seems efficient - why poor performance?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message