Re: Pluggable database in 12C
From: scottgamble_at_comcast.net <zifnabiom_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 08:22:22 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <a33aa122-b743-414e-a48c-333b88c50456_at_googlegroups.com>
> It's not just the contention. In MSSQL I can easily restore a PDB from a backup
>
> and do a PITR without affecting any of the other PDBs. And of course I can back
>
> it up separately as well! I hope I can do that with 12c as well but I don't see
>
> exactly how at this stage. Early days though, so let's wait and see. I suspect
>
> we'll see a "re-synch" utility/function to provide such flexibility and other
>
> necessary global dictionary integrity.
>
>
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 08:22:22 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <a33aa122-b743-414e-a48c-333b88c50456_at_googlegroups.com>
> It's not just the contention. In MSSQL I can easily restore a PDB from a backup
>
> and do a PITR without affecting any of the other PDBs. And of course I can back
>
> it up separately as well! I hope I can do that with 12c as well but I don't see
>
> exactly how at this stage. Early days though, so let's wait and see. I suspect
>
> we'll see a "re-synch" utility/function to provide such flexibility and other
>
> necessary global dictionary integrity.
>
>
I asked this question at OOW and the answer was that you can backup and recover at the individual PDB level without affecting the other PDB's or do it at the CDB.
They said anything you can do now on a database you can do on a PDB. Fully backward compatible. Received on Sun Oct 21 2012 - 17:22:22 CEST