Re: The reason for loving Usenet
From: Jeremy <jeremy0505_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 16:29:07 +0100
Message-ID: <MPG.2a037a1e86c6e993989999_at_News.Individual.NET>
In article <jnboo3$926$1_at_solani.org>, gogala.mladen_at_gmail.com says...
>
> On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 15:00:23 +0100, Jeremy wrote:
> >> >It could otherwise be the "thin end of the wedge" as
> >> > people become increasingly "free" with their language.
> >>
> >> Since when is freedom a bad thing? Community with people speaking
> >> freely is something that has to be nipped in the bud? Frankly, I
> >> believe that the moderator is a moron. I can say it aloud because this
> >> is Usenet, no moderators here.
> >
> > You're misinterpreting me (see the danger of the written rather than
> > spoken word?). My fault, or perhaps yours.
>
> I fail to see the danger.
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 16:29:07 +0100
Message-ID: <MPG.2a037a1e86c6e993989999_at_News.Individual.NET>
In article <jnboo3$926$1_at_solani.org>, gogala.mladen_at_gmail.com says...
>
> On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 15:00:23 +0100, Jeremy wrote:
> >> >It could otherwise be the "thin end of the wedge" as
> >> > people become increasingly "free" with their language.
> >>
> >> Since when is freedom a bad thing? Community with people speaking
> >> freely is something that has to be nipped in the bud? Frankly, I
> >> believe that the moderator is a moron. I can say it aloud because this
> >> is Usenet, no moderators here.
> >
> > You're misinterpreting me (see the danger of the written rather than
> > spoken word?). My fault, or perhaps yours.
>
> I fail to see the danger.
The "danger" is that it appeared you were sugesting that I was antifreedom. If I had said "increasingly robust" perhaps that would have been more appropriate.
-- jeremyReceived on Thu Apr 26 2012 - 10:29:07 CDT