Re: 10.2.0.1 trace uncommitted inserts

# That is not what Mladen said or implied.

So you are Mladen are twins that understand exactly what the other was trying to convey in a newsgroup posting?

I did not realize that ...

# The intent here is to suggest that the OP possibly create a trigger
to capture insert transactions into a separate table, with other information such as who did the insert and when, to track what is or isn't  happening.

That's such a better idea than getting a 10046 trace initially eh?

# There was no mention that the venedor is using triggers.

Try reading the next several lines of Mladens reply that I left out a couple of times. Do the shampoo thing ( rinse and repeat ) ... Received on Fri Apr 29 2011 - 17:29:10 CDT