Re: Playing With Truncate and Date
From: John Hurley <hurleyjohnb_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2011 10:12:02 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <a490c259-132b-4b3a-a7f3-31f97dc0fd98_at_o21g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
Maxim:
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2011 10:12:02 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <a490c259-132b-4b3a-a7f3-31f97dc0fd98_at_o21g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
Maxim:
# What Michel implied (i suppose) to tell
- it is bad to rely on implicit conversion, if you can avoid it
- it is worse, if such conversions are nls dependent, as it may introduce problems which are hard to identify
- it is worse to promote such bad practice, as somebody, not aware of it, may take it for good practice.
Now that makes sense. I did not look long at all at the referenced blog that had the material. I assumed ( apparently incorrectly ) that the writer would have at least given some background about what their environment was that their examples worked in. Received on Sun Mar 06 2011 - 12:12:02 CST