Re: Upgrading OEM

From: Noons <wizofoz2k_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:50:18 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <b181fc34-79c4-4caf-b7bb-ad1f7029b037_at_d9g2000prh.googlegroups.com>



On Oct 23, 2:48 am, joel garry <joel-ga..._at_home.com> wrote:
> On Oct 22, 4:17 am, Noons <wizofo..._at_yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>
> > Shakespeare wrote,on my timestamp of 22/10/2009 5:25 AM:
>
> > > Tried the upgrade on AIX (64bit). After several attempts, SR's,
> > > consultants etc. installed a new repository.
>
> > Aye!  Just going through the pain right now.
> > We have a fresh install but the stupid TZ problem is an issue at the moment.
> > Why on earth is Oracle still forcing folks to install first 10.2.0.1 and THEN
> > upgrade to 10.2.0.5 totally defies description.
> > This, on a supposedly "widespread use" product.
> > Yeah! Right...
>
> Because it's even worse to change procedures in the middle of a patch
> sequence.  Oh wait, they've already done that with this cpu stuff...
> is it 3 times now?  Never mind.

LOL! Too true... Received on Thu Oct 22 2009 - 18:50:18 CDT

Original text of this message