Re: Which SQL is the best for servers?
From: Gene Wirchenko <genew_at_ocis.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 19:47:08 -0800
Message-ID: <8kckp4pa37q35r1dtqsebfd97dllrpbsqn_at_4ax.com>
Paulie <linehan.paul_at_gmail.com> wrote:
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 19:47:08 -0800
Message-ID: <8kckp4pa37q35r1dtqsebfd97dllrpbsqn_at_4ax.com>
Paulie <linehan.paul_at_gmail.com> wrote:
[snip]
>No CPU data, no disk array data - they haven't even chosen
>an OS and are not sure where to put their web server (and
>no mention of an app server tier!).
It might be a real project, but it has a feel of irreality. I can not tell if it is wishful thinking or just a homework project.
>Maybe they should run with the mauve db?
Paulie, I am shocked, simply shocked at your poor advice.
OP stated: 'Since the server may come with only 32GB of RAM, which SQL can run the "leanest" - that is, not a memory hog?'
Remember: mauve has the most RAM, so it would not be appropriate
here.
</silly>
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
Computerese Irregular Verb Conjugation:
I have preferences.
You have biases.
He/She has prejudices.
Received on Mon Feb 16 2009 - 21:47:08 CST
