Re: Which SQL is the best for servers?
From: Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex_at_attglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:54:17 -0500
Message-ID: <gnd8sq$cl2$2_at_news.motzarella.org>
Geoff Muldoon wrote:
> In article <gncr90$61p$1_at_news.motzarella.org>, Jerry Stuckle says...
>
> In an ideal world, yes.
>
>
> My comments were simply based on the OPs restriction on O/S. There may be
> valid non-ideal-world reasons for that restriction.
>
> Geoff M
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:54:17 -0500
Message-ID: <gnd8sq$cl2$2_at_news.motzarella.org>
Geoff Muldoon wrote:
> In article <gncr90$61p$1_at_news.motzarella.org>, Jerry Stuckle says...
>> Geoff Muldoon wrote: >>> Jerry Stuckle says... >>>> pg wrote: >>>>> The server would run Linux or one of the BSD variant >>>> You also missed DB2, SQL Server and several others. >>> Scrap MSSQL Server as a candidate given the above O/S requirement. >>> >>> Geoff M >>> >>> Running 3 RHEL4 boxes in an Oracle RAC cluster, with web interfaces >>> (RHEL5/Apache/php) on separate VMWare ESX gear. >> The OS should be picked based on the requirements of the database and >> rest of the system, not vice versa.
>
> In an ideal world, yes.
>
>> I'm not saying I'm recommending SQL Server (or any other RDBMS for that >> matter). But determining the hardware and OS before the rest of the >> requirements are determined places artificial limits on the rest of the >> system.
>
> My comments were simply based on the OPs restriction on O/S. There may be
> valid non-ideal-world reasons for that restriction.
>
> Geoff M
More than just ideal world. The higher the requirements, the more important it is. And he has some pretty high requirements.
-- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry Stuckle JDS Computer Training Corp. jstucklex_at_attglobal.net ==================Received on Mon Feb 16 2009 - 20:54:17 CST