Re: When should one rebuild an index?

"joel garry" <joel-garry_at_home.com> wrote in message news:506a42b2-cee6-4064-be25-e9fa500f3b54_at_z28g2000prd.googlegroups.com... On Jan 5, 4:54 pm, "Bob Jones" <em..._at_me.not> wrote:
> "Noons" <wizofo..._at_yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
>
> news:gjl3g1$vdr$1_at_news.motzarella.org...> Mladen Gogala wrote,on my
> timestamp of 2/01/2009 8:03 PM:
>
> >> learning. All things being said, this is still my favorite place
> >> because
> >> there is no censorship.
>
> Only reason I still come back from time to time.
> I'd rather put up with bozos like NS than dull
> arse-kissers and rude newbies like MG.

>I must say, I respect those guys because of the informative postings
> they've made over a long period of time (and I mean decades in the
>case of Noons).

As informative as this thread? I see.

>Can't say as I've seen anything really useful from you. Care to point
>towards something you've done that would improve my opinion?

Care to read the thread before inserting comments?

>Nothing
>wrong with lurking, nothing wrong with opinions, but it does help
>everyone if people contribute positively when they can, and no one
>wants to see plain negativity.

The negativity started when someone cut in the middle of this thread with some rude nonsense.

If all you saw was negativity, then unbiased negativity is still better than biased positivity (ass-kissing). Wouldn't you agree? Received on Mon Jan 05 2009 - 20:46:09 CST