Re: When should one rebuild an index?
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 22:00:05 -0600
Message-ID: <a7C6l.7725$hc1.1015@flpi150.ffdc.sbc.com>
"Noons" <wizofoz2k_at_gmail.com> wrote in message
news:94e1a6f6-ac55-4a46-980c-a22d483398e6_at_v5g2000prm.googlegroups.com...
> Bob Jones wrote:
>
>> > and he doesn't identify himself ever,
>> > which is not the case with DA Morgan.
>> > Anyone who insists on personal vendettas
>> > on the Usenet without full identification is
>> > immediately defined as a low-life troll with
>> > no credibility whatsoever.
>>
>> I have never heard anything quite as absurd.
>
> Apparently, your hearing is bad. If you'd care
> to READ instead, which is what people do on Usenet,
> you might find it more gratifying? It's not hard, just
> go back above and carry on.
>
No, I don't find reading your comments gratifying at all. It is actually very boring.
>> It appears you share Captain
>> Morgan's believe - your credibility in this group is based on your name
>> and
>> not what you post here.
>
> I don't share ANYTHING with Daniel: we have disagreed many
> times before, here and elsewhere, it's on public record.
> And anyway, you don't know ANYTHING about me to claim I
> share anything with anyone, so stop trying to be childish:
> it borders on boring and it's demeaning to you.
>
It shows just the opposite in this thread. You also like to go off the topic and to other threads.
>> Why would it matter?
>
> Because someone might not be aware that I have
> the courage of putting my name where my writing
> is.
> Something sorely lacking on many cowards in the
> Usenet who use anonimity as a way to hide while
> stating their lies.
>
Wow, having a little too much Captain Morgan in you?
>> I am not expecting someone here to reach me or trying
>> to sell anything.
>
> Good. Excellent, even!
> And what the heck has that got to do with anything?
That means using your "real name" doesn't do any good here, especially when it is reflected poorly. Received on Tue Dec 30 2008 - 22:00:05 CST