Re: Metalink moved
From: <Joey.Dantoni_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 11:28:43 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <2d6dc488-c113-4f3c-b026-6c5dc870e251@y71g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 11:28:43 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <2d6dc488-c113-4f3c-b026-6c5dc870e251@y71g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>
On Oct 2, 9:46 am, Frank van Bortel <frank.van.bor..._at_gmail.com>
wrote:
> kyb..._at_mail.med.upenn.edu wrote:
>
> > The BIG question for me is how long are they going to keep
> > "classic metalink" around????
>
> forever, I hope - they just don't understand lean and mean
> is just a tad more professional.
> Take Google - you think a flash intro would have worked for
> them? No way.
>
Frank--agree completely. I'm still using classic Metalink--it wasn't broken so why fix it? There were a few improvements that could have been made, but keep the same basic clean look. Received on Thu Oct 02 2008 - 13:28:43 CDT