Re: 10g with HACMP (no RAC)?
From: DA Morgan <damorgan_at_psoug.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:11:22 -0700
Message-ID: <1221099082.228977@bubbleator.drizzle.com>
> Accepted.
>
> This IBM "box" (actually a pair of frames) is unlikely to gather dust in
> the warehouse though; it has cost the client $$$ and is running a number
> of applications on umpteen LPARs.
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:11:22 -0700
Message-ID: <1221099082.228977@bubbleator.drizzle.com>
Palooka wrote:
> joel garry wrote:
>> Apologies, my rant is with the management that created your issues. >> It appears to have all the red flags of a project doomed to failure. >> One time I signed on as a contractor to implement one installation of >> such a multi$M project, and wound up supporting the successful one >> that was hacked out by a couple of guys. The IBM box gathered dust in >> the warehouse. >>
> Accepted.
>
> This IBM "box" (actually a pair of frames) is unlikely to gather dust in
> the warehouse though; it has cost the client $$$ and is running a number
> of applications on umpteen LPARs.
If it is a z10 please contact me off-line.
-- Daniel A. Morgan Oracle Ace Director & Instructor University of Washington damorgan_at_x.washington.edu (replace x with u to respond) Puget Sound Oracle Users Group www.psoug.orgReceived on Wed Sep 10 2008 - 21:11:22 CDT